• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

Mark Potter

Midweek musings – Rock flattens Hut

3rd November 2021 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

One of the reasons I don’t own shares directly (other then for exceptional reasons) is that most of the available shares in any given company are owned by gigantic institutions and if they decide to sell large blocks, the market will usually get wind of that and the share price will plummet. The more concentrated the ownership of shares in a business, the greater that risk becomes.

Yesterday there was a perfect example of that risk turning into reality. A business which has a chequered history is called THG or the Hut group. Its shares were quoted at around 800 pence at the start of the year after floating as a new listing at 500 pence. That was a classic case in itself – the market rating a retailer with not much special going for it as it it was a technology business. It has happened before (ASOS, in its early days).

When will they ever learn?

The mega investor BlackRock built up a 10% holding in the company or 124 million shares (data anyone could check out using stock market ownership notices). They have now decided they don’t want to keep all those shares and are selling half of them. To shift that many shares in one go is not easy, even for BlackRock, so they have offered them at a discount to a price that has alraedy plummeted – in fact at 195 pence.

So if you bought the shares at 800 pence on the basis of a Sunday paper tip written by some lazy pundit (people do that), you would be 75% down by now!

If you owned these shares in a fund, the most you could possibly own (and your fund manager would be due to be sacked if you did) would be 10% of the fund. so your maximum loss would be 7.5%.

In summary, if you want to speculate in shares, remember that you might well be a sprat swimming in the whales’ feeding grounds.

Filed Under: Education, Rants, Trading

Watching Brief – November 2021

1st November 2021 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Pottering About

A confusing Budget?

The UK has just had a government Budget which was the oddest one I can remember.  In fact, it seemed utterly pointless.  All the bad news was announced a while back (increased National Insurance, frozen allowances and so on) and all the good news was leaked in the days approaching the formal Budget speech.

Several independent commentators have suggested that taken together, increased taxation and inflation will seriously cramp the spending of the average family or person in the UK by the mid-2020s which is not a going to be good for that part of economic growth driven by consumerism.  Some of the announced extra spend in the public sector may compensate for that. 

No wonder Tory MPs are a little bemused.  Apparently, this government has presented public spending and taxation plans that look like those of the post war Attlee government!

Markets will have been interested in the Chancellor’s comments that inflation is an issue and that he had sent a reminder to the Bank of England that their job it to suppress it (might they have let that slip their minds?).  However, the currency markets have been pointing to higher interest rates in the UK for some time (and indeed gilt yields have risen sharply).

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Uncategorised

Midweek Musings – Grimm outlook?

27th October 2021 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

This week saw the market value Tesla at over 1 trillion US dollars or more than all the rest of the US auto businesses added together. That valuation makes no sense on any conventional accounting measure or the long standing principles of value. If you buy Tesla shares at the current price, you either believe it will corner the market in electric cars in way that will allow it to make super profits for years (highly unlikely) or you just think the shares are like crypto, so well loved that whatever the price, someone will want to buy them later at a higher price.

That reminded me of a proposition I heard expounded by Professor Schiller, the Yale ecomonist and market guru. He suggested that human behaviour was heavily influneced by stories. We all love to hear and tell stories, and it seems that all cultures have histories of folk tales, such as those incorpoarted into the collections of the Brothers Grimm, Hans Christian Anderson and others.

The Professor’s argument (as interpreted by me) was that the explosion of social media and the internet means that we are all exposed to an overload of information and we probably get comfortable with a tale that fits in with our personal biases that and we can maybe share with our social circle.

There has been many a comedy sketch show written on the basis of a national audience understanding what is the favoured topic for the gym, the pub, the dinner party and so on. Where I live every small social group will include someone who has ‘made a tidy sum’ from Bitcoin or similar (plus a few silent ones who have lost a tidy sum, I guess!).

In the UK, people legendarily talk about house prices and Brexit, and maybe vaccines these days. I can even report that a certain section of the community where I live is fascinated with the price and acquisition of vegetables and of course almost anywhere a mostly male group will tend to elaborate/fantasize on their favourite sport, hitting better golf shots, catching bigger fish and and making a great deal of having been at school with a famous footballer.

You thought I studied heavy technical texts – wrong, I am usually reading childrens’ books 🙂

If this is a genetically embedded human characteristic, then maybe participants in the investment markets buy assets on the basis of what others tell them directly or indirectly, in other words what is an accepted popular assessment and not what makes strict financial sense.

I think we can see plenty of evidence of that.

We must however remember one of the most insightful stories of all times, credited to Anderson, but based on a 14th century Spanish tale from a collection of cautionary fables – The Emporer’s New Clothes. A story of 2 swindlers who tell such a good story everyone is scared of exposing it. It takes an innocent child to decry the fraud, but actually, the emporer still tries to bluff it out (‘fake it ’til you make it’?)

In my assessment, fundamentals come through in the end and a false valuation of assets, whether it be shares in a medical testing company, Twitter or an electric truck maker, all of which are said to have told tall tales, will revert to something that can be asessed on a factual, not a fictional basis

Filed Under: Members Only, Monthly commentary, Rants

Midweek Musings – manager style research concluded

20th October 2021 by Mark Potter 2 Comments

In my October Watching Brief post I introduced a Digging Deeper topic initiated by readers who wanted some pointers on identifying manager style.

You may find it useful to read the introductory comments when I suggested starting with the house style. In the example I chose, which was a real request to me for comment on a fund, I have been looking at the Baillie Gifford Income Growth fund.

The managers in person – getting to know them

I think all readers will know that you can find out who in person manages a fund using resources like Trustnet and Morningstar and most of the time you will easily find a short biography, supplied by the employer and consistent in all research sources. This bio may be expanded on the fund provider’s own web site but that is in my experience unusual.

Base facts that I usually pay attention to are:

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Education, Funds, Members Only, Monthly commentary

ESG research tip and some ‘style’ discovery

14th October 2021 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

In the course of reviewing my own investments, I have just looked at the Jupiter Ecology fund which I rebought recently after a period when I had left it off my short list because of weak performance. A change of manager in early 2021 and a look at some of the holdings in the top 10 had prompted me to give it another run.

The new manager, Jon Wallace, is not known to me as a personality and so I thought I would see what I could find out about him, fitting in with my ongoing project on finding out about manager style. Jupiter has a long track record as an investor in environmentally positive businesses but their ‘old guard’ has now maybe retired and I wanted to get an idea of what the new manager was like.

Of course, he has a little biography published in the fund fact sheet and on the firm’s web site (and he has a very specifically suitable CV) but I wanted to hear him talk, so I looked for videos and found an interview he did with a TV channel I don’t know (ProActive -possibly internet only) about his investment trust – the Jupiter Green Trust.

He won’t necessary run an investmemt trust in the same way is his open ended (OEIC) fund but his answers over a few minutes to a couple of good open questions about how he and Jupiter work allowed me to get some idea of his competence and the way he looks at ESG issues, including what he has absorbed of Jupiter’s established culture as an ESG investor. Jupiter is known to run environmental investing as a major business theme and to have a whole long establised team dedicated to ecloogical issues.

I came away believing all is well and he is on top of his brief in detail (probably because his academic education is on topic), which together with an updated look at a few of the really interesting companies in the top 10 has left me more than comfortable owning this fund.

Of course, I am not recommending the fund to anyone (if that sort of investment interests you, please do your own research) because that is not my role, but I am reporting how I keep an eye on funds I already own, try to uprate my knowledge from time to time and gradually get a feel for what a manager is trying to deliver.

My conclusion to the Digging Deeeper article on manager style is still a work in progress and will be published soon!

Filed Under: Funds, Portfolios, Research tools, Sustainability/ESG

Midweek Musings – labour votes Conservative?

13th October 2021 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

A whole range of news coverage leads one to the inevitable conclusion that we are at a potential inflection point in the long term relationship between what economists call ‘the factors of production’. These factors are usually stated as being land, capital and labour, with enterprise touted as a potential extra when I was at college – possibly because top managers did not like being classified as labour!

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Economics, Members Only, Monthly commentary, Politics

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 41
  • Page 42
  • Page 43
  • Page 44
  • Page 45
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 97
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mid-month Musings – September 2026
  • Deep Dive – September 2026
  • Mid Month Musings with Mark (not me!)
  • Thank You
  • Deep Dive – August 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised