• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

Portfolios

Midweek Musings – the 2 most common investor errors

24th May 2023 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Diversification – remember what that means.

All investors make mistakes, even those as famous as Warren Buffet or Terry Smith.

Purchasing investments is about applying general, sound principles that are rooted in the very essence of capitalism and diligent application of those principles and some common sense will always result in acceptable returns over the long run.

However, even though a diversified portfolio of quality funds will always make money long term (if it didn’t, capitalism would have failed too), we can all have components in our portfolios that we worry about, because they are not making money at the moment.

Furthermore, when we pick funds or shares, we are making a judgement based on logic and the data we have available. The facts can and do change or we may even have had incomplete data, or misunderstood its meaning, so we will (all of us) buy investments that are unsuitable when reviewed with that wonderful all-knowing review tool called hindsight.

I used to estimate that I would regret recommending one or two out of every ten funds I put in front of clients. Over the years, the error rate improved, but I still make mistakes now (eg backing fintech at the wrong point in the cycle).

Never forget that if a portfolio did not have any funds performing in a different way to the general market trend, by definition, it would not be diversified.

It would be unsusual, for example, for the large cap global growth funds in your portfolio to be doing well and at the same time to be raking it in on your defensive value funds. If the markets like Tesla and Netflix, they almost certainly don’t want to buy Nestle or Unilever (and vice versa). You might think that you can tactically switch between funds to be always in line with the relevant market factors and if you can do that well, I recommend that you start up your own investment blog!

Anyone out there want to let me fully retire to my slippers and hi-fi?

In reality, and I say this based on over 30 years of reviewing portfolios with investors, human nature means that nearly everyone, on scanning a list of owned funds with recent past performance numbers, will focus on the funds that are showing losses, generally without any reference to their portfolio weighting, when they were bought or what the difference is between performance over varying time periods.

Thinking about this calmly and objectively, we might be tempted into saying – ‘Oh, that’s not me – I take the long view and once I have understood why a fund is underperforming for now, I am chilled about it’.

I am sorry to say that my experience is that even if investors (and I include most IFAS in this analysis) would like to see themselves that way, almost everyone actually stresses out about the funds they own with red or negative numbers showing in their reports.

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Funds, Members Only, Monthly commentary, Portfolios, Research tools

Midweek Musing – is tactical asset allocation worthwhile?

10th May 2023 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

What is tactical asset allocation?

To answer that question we need to start by understanding the preferred starting point of the ‘alternative’ strategic asset allocation. This is the concept of building a portfolio with a range of asset types with varying degrees of correlation so as to achieve returns in line with our objectives at an acceptable level of volatility.

Investment theory developed over many decades suggests that the ‘right’ asset mix will see returns inevitably impacted by short term systemic changes in market direction, but that the worst volatility will be smoothed out in a well designed portfolio and over the long term returns will be reasonably predictable. Because the market’s short term volatility is in effect allowed for in the model asset mix, provided no major cash flows in or out take place, the asset mix can be generally left alone.

The idea of a well diversified long term mix of equities, bonds and maybe property, commodities and cash is the foundation of all multi-asset portfolios although some narrower equity/bond mixes are promoted as low cost ‘risk controlled’ and ”buy and forget’ products by all sorts of invesment advisers from Vanguard and BlackRock with their passive index trackers to expensive wealth management firms with their model portfolio offerings.

Although I started by saying that what I am calling strategic asset allocation is the alternative to tactical asset allocation, that was really not accurate. Tactical asset allocation is an overlay, or development of strategic asset allocation.

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Academic theory, Asset Allocation, Members Only, Monthly commentary, Passives and Trackers, Portfolios

Midweek Musings – Slicing and Dicing

26th April 2023 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

This post was prompted by a conversation I had with a subscriber this week, but I will have touched on the topic in discussion with quite a few readers in recent months.

I am referring to the concept of looking at your porfolio data through different data windows when conducting a review. This is something investors will find useful as they get more experienced at periodic reviews and in processing their data . For those who are not Excel aces, I can offer a template spreadsheet and some training in using it for a modest temporary subscription increase. In all cases, I am happy to help subscribers paying for personal support at no extra cost if you just want to better understand the idea.

The essentials

There is already on the web site a series of articles in the ‘How To’ section on making sale decisions, reading Morninstar X-Rays (an essential part of any review) and a worked through example of a full rather over deferred porfolio review.

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Education, Members Only, Monthly commentary, Portfolios

Midweek Musings – UK market underpriced?

9th March 2023 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

As markets swing around with the inconsistent pronouncements of central bankers who appear to have no idea what is driving inflation, what the next set of data will be, nor why trends are what they, we can only stick with fundamental facts in deciding on what assets to buy.

I have been talking positively about UK equities with subscribers over many months now because although the news media would have you believe that the UK economy is pants, with good reason, there are plenty of UK businesses that make good profits irrespective of what happens to UK GDP, how many refugees arrive on boats or which stock market a global company chooses to list its shares.

This quote from Allianz Global Investors (courtesy of Citywire) says it all:

I could not make the point any better than this quotation

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Asset Allocation, Funds, Members Only, Monthly commentary, Portfolios

Midweek Musings – Poles apart

18th January 2023 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Every day, weekends included, a vast amount of news comes our way. I read mainstream news from the Uk and USA, using multiple online resources to get a balanced view and I also see ‘trade’ newsflows from investment companies and the specialist media such as Citywire. In addition, I watch specialist webinars and listen to some podcasts.

I hope this all postpones the onset of dementia!

That podcast was just TOO boring!

Distilling down what multiple experts think is going to happen to investment markets and asset classes is a relatively automatic task for the NotHarry little grey cells. At the moment, I would say there are 2 distinct and very different schools of thought, both of which have proponents of good reputation and credibility.

The soft landing case

This goes along these lines:

Inflation is coming under control, economic growth has been braked but not killed off, corporates are still making money and central bankers will slow the pace of rate rises and in due course start cutting rates.

It is clear that the fixed income markets have been driven by something like this point of view since Octover or November 2022 and equity markets quickly followed along.

The Cassandras

Knowing they are never wrong and that you will regret not believing them, the other experts suggest that inflation will be much harder to constrain and central banks are quite prepared to force a recession to increase unemployment and frighten consumers. To do that they will keep putting up interest rates which will reverse recent foolishly optimistic gains in the fixed income markets and start the sort of cycle that can only be very bad news for equities.

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Asset Allocation, Markets, Members Only, Monthly commentary, Portfolios

Midweek Musings (plus Hit or Myth)

11th January 2023 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Some confidence but not universal

We are now far enough into 2023 to get some idea of the market mood. It always takes a couple of weeks to see if the big players are pessimistic, raising cash and not adding to equity holdings, or nervous about missing out on a first half pick up in equity valuations and thereby blowing their bonus prospects.

This year, although there are many high profile commentators, including Terry Smith of Fundsmith, predicting a poor 2023 for a variety of reasons which are not all factual, I think that the fear of not being in the market is more powerful than a preference for cash with seriously negative real rates of return.

A curiosity has been a jump in the price of gold. I guess that this might be because it has become the next most interesting thing to speculate in for those mainly younger players who are now disillusioned with crypto.

It is still very early in the year and of course one cannot predict the impact of major events, some of which we will be surprised by, but I am at the moment feeling optimistic about equities and bonds, very negative about real estate, both commercial and residential,and generally pleased that equity markets are priced on more normal measures after a couple of years of folly.

Sunny times ahead?

I will comment on fixed income funds shortly as a number of my readers have been doing useful research into what you can find by way of funds in that asset class and after a period of owning not a single bond fund, I am moving some money into fixed income

Now I want to offer the second, late, part of my normal monthly output.

Hit or Myth

This time the claim is: Past performance is not a guide to the future

I can imagine you are thinking that this is a bit of a waste of time – regulators make sure you get told the above every time you buy any investment and I myself am always warning people off of using performance alone to pick funds or review recent portfolio performance.

So this is a hit – it must be true, surely?

In fact, if you apply an intelligent interpretation to the exact statement, it is in many ways a myth.

By one must qualify that contradiction by saying that past performance, when understood and used to understand a current valuation, may very often be a useful guide to the future.

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Education, Funds, Markets, Members Only, Monthly commentary, Portfolios

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 25
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mid-month Musings – September 2026
  • Deep Dive – September 2026
  • Mid Month Musings with Mark (not me!)
  • Thank You
  • Deep Dive – August 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised