• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

Funds

If you smell a (dead) rat, there usually is a dead rat.

21st August 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

I have twice in my life owned thatched cottages. They look great, are well insulated and a bit quirky. But the roofs are teaming with wildlife, especially rodents.

Now if the sound of mice and rats running around on your bedroom ceiling starts to get to you, you turn to methods of elimination, or to be realistic, suppression. That usually involves poisons and the problem with a poisoned rat is that it dies slowly and it can crawl up and die in your roof. That is a sort of revenge, post mortem. You will know the dead rat is there, pretty soon. The appalling smell will tell you. How long it takes you to find the corpse will be a variable.

What my repeated experience of this aspect of country life told me was that if you think you smell a dead rat, there always is a dead rat.

I make this point because sometimes I come across an investment in someone’s portfolio that looks to be too good to be true. I investigate it in the way I suggest everyone does in my article on screening for funds – using Google and reading everything you can find that cross references the fund, the management group and the manager.

Sometimes, there are hints of unusual investment strategies, assets that can’t easily be valued and ‘charismatic’ personalities. These are for me rat-like odours.

I recently checked out a bond fund run by a London based asset management company that has not been around that long. The fund had delivered exceptionally good results. The fund management house is associated with a large French bank, so looks solid.

The problem is that the management group seems to like investing in private loans to the businesses of effectively just one individual, who has a far from pristine track record for paying the money back. Furthermore, the fund manager and this person seem to have a close personal relationship.

On top of that, it is accepted that these private debt assets are illiquid and that their value is somewhat ‘notional’. The fund has been closely scrutinised by an experienced financial journalist, prompting a defence pointing out that it has plenty of more conventional liquid assets and no plans to restrict withdrawals.

I think the smell is too strong for me to be tempted by the remarkable returns and awards cabinet of the fund manager. I may be completely wrong, but investing here is one risk I would not be taking.

Filed Under: Funds

Tale of 2 funds

17th July 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Here are data for 2 funds (Source: Morningstar, July 2019)

Fund 1 Fund 2
Rating 5 stars 4 stars
Fees 0.22% pa 1.99% pa
Equity/Fixed Income Mix 60/40 100/0
Volatility (3 year SD) Low High
3 year return (annualised) 8.21 14.09
Year to date return 13.82 24.57

Which is the best fund?

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Education, Funds, Members Only, Uncategorised

The lies have it

20th May 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Investment fund managers are usually well educated people and the best ones have talent and intelligence too. Sometimes it is interesting to read what they publish about their own research, which can be very wide ranging.

A fund I have known for many years, in fact even in forms before it got its current name, is the Jupiter Absolute Return fund. This is run by Dr James Cluney, who got his PhD researching the processes of stock market shorting in the UK and elsewhere. His fund tends to be a sort of parachute, slowing portfolio losses when things are really going wrong, but being a bit of extra weight to carry when markets are soaring away.

He correctly predicted the market sell off in 2018 and more or less protected his investors from losses. This year, he has lost money and although that is to be expected if markets go up when logically they shouldn’t, I wanted to see if he had commented on the reasons. Investors may be tempted to sell out if they just read the recent numbers.

I have not so far found a very recent article or interview but I did find a fascinating and indeed quite insightful piece into how share valuations are now influenced by what is a called the ‘narrative’ effect. Essentially this is the flow of news, both true and ‘managed’ (ie to suit the issuer’s purpose) that is available from both traditional sources and more often than ever, social media.

For example, he explains that he has been ‘shorting” Tesla shares, so he is one of the people Elon Musk hates. On every technical measure used by fund mangers, shorting Tesla shares is logical, but we know that Elon Musk does his utmost (including illegally recently) to pump up the Tesla share price by using media of all types, essentially trying to control the Tesla news narrative. We can’t him blame for that unless he wonders off into telling ‘porkies’!

Another example might be the floatation of Lyft and Uber. In the case of Uber, we even had the company complying with the law by stating it may never make a profit, but so managing the other ‘facts’ (most of which are irrelevant when examined carefully) that is raised billions of pounds from investors who may never get paid a dividend! That it stretching optimism to its limits and beyond.

As a cautious fund manager, whose objective is to preserve client capital, Dr Cluney has to take a view about whether he can afford to stick to his convictions based on real data and yet, at least for now, see share prices move in line with what is basically propaganda, or give up and ‘go with the flow’. I wrote another post recently about the option of momentum investing, for members.

In his article he expresses concern that as people follow the lead of the US president by manipulating the facts, telling straight lies and blustering, then it becomes difficult to make decisions based on facts, because there may be more information around that is pure ‘fog’ designed to hide the reality from investors than it is possible to see through. One might add that like many motorway drivers there are plenty of investors happy to carry on at full speed even though they have no idea what is a few dozen meters ahead of them.

As Mr Musk found out, blatantly ‘pumping’ a share price with a misleading announcement will be punished by regulators. However, there are techniques that may not be so easily spotted. According to Dr Cluney, algorithmic research tools read words in media content and make positive or negative judgements according to the words counted. But people working in the investor relations departments of businesses know that! So they can use their writing skills to fill up press releases, tweets and other social media posts with positive words, even if out of context (algorithms not being so intelligent) and get a share onto broker ‘buy’ lists even when the underlying truths was negative!

As usual, we can’t know what will cause the next market crash – it is usually one of the ‘unknown unknowns’. But I would have a small bet on fiction having at least temporarily defeated fact being major contributor.

Filed Under: Education, Funds, Markets

What a wind up! (m)

29th April 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

I have been asked recently to comment on the events that follow when a fund manager chooses to close a collective fund and wind it down, paying back all the investors.

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Basics, Education, Funds

Don’t look back in anger (m)

15th April 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

You need to be logged in to view this content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Basics, Education, Funds, Members Only

JP Morgan Global Macro Opportunities fund (m)

9th April 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

This fund is in the list of reviewed funds available to members and in some example portfolios. Although it is run by a team two of the most senior members have left since the review was written and recent performance is not impressive. I will be adding some reservations to the fund commentary as a result.

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Funds, Members Only

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 14
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mid-month Musings – September 2026
  • Deep Dive – September 2026
  • Mid Month Musings with Mark (not me!)
  • Thank You
  • Deep Dive – August 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised