• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

Emperor’s new clothes

10th June 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

You may have read stories about an American company that will list on NASDAQ called Nikola. Unsurprisingly it is a self proclaimed competitor for Tesla.

Now readers will know that I think Tesla’s stock market valuation is bizarre relative to its business model but it has now reached the point of actually making stuff and in some cases pretty successfully – just not at a profit. I think I must own some Tesla shares through one or more of the innovations or discovery funds I like, but I would not personally buy them.

The reporting of ‘puffs’ by the owners of companies that make nothing (especially not profits) has got out of hand.

Unlike Tesla, Nikola has not yet made a single vehicle. I note that in 2016, within a year of being founded, it was reported to have taken billions of dollars of pre-orders for trucks it has ‘thought up’ (my phrase). This week’s news stories reference billions of dollars of pre-orders again (the same ones?). But it has told the American listing authority (where you have to be honest, or you go to jail) that it plans to make 600 trucks next year. 600 – in a year!

I believe Ford and GM make that many trucks each every day, and maybe more.

Yet the notional stock market valuation of the new company is claimed by its CEO to be approaching that of General Motors. Nikola is a company who say their revenue will be about 3 billion dollars in 2024 (revenue, not profit) which compares with an actual, not projected, 2019 revenue at GM of about 138 billion and an 8 billion profit.

None so blind as they who will not see, as the saying goes. They have raised half a billion dollars to keep trying to make a business. As has been said many times, it is easier to borrow a billion than a million.

There will be a price to pay when these fantasies vanish like morning mist. The direct losses may not impact you or me, but there will be an indirect impact as supposed value vanishes from the global capital markets.

Filed Under: Rants

Reader Interactions

Click here to cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mid-month Musings – September 2026
  • Deep Dive – September 2026
  • Mid Month Musings with Mark (not me!)
  • Thank You
  • Deep Dive – August 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised