• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

How much can you like a company?

10th June 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

I don’t generally comment on investment trusts (ITs) as they are listed shares with different risk characteristics to open ended funds (OEICs), but they are a form of collective investment and some argue they are a cheaper way to access a fund manager’s skills. That assumption is not based on a general reality, but on some selective observations of certain trusts.

I looked at the Lindsell Train IT recently because it came to my notice while I was researching the Japan OEIC covered in my monthly subscriber newsletter. It is a great example of people taking a really big bet and quite likely not knowing what they are doing!

The shares in the trust are at an astonishing 100% premium to the asset valuation! That means people are paying twice as much to buy a block of assets via this trust than they would pay if they just went and bought the same assets directly. They can only be doing that because one key asset is the Lindsell Train business, whose shares you just can’t acquire in the ordinary market.

I had to check and re-check that – it was so remarkable. The fund is 100% geared, so has borrowed against the security of the investments such that if it was wound up in severe difficulty, the shareholders would get nothing (or a very small payout). The banks would probably be able to take all the assets.

Worse than that, a sharp fall in markets would likely trigger covenants in the bank lending agreements that would require loan repayments, making the trust a forced seller of shares in a falling market. Did the word Woodford pop up in your mind?

The dividend yield is well below that of the main shareholdings, at 1%. So no-one is buying this fund for income.

Errr..how does that make sense?

Notably, almost half the trust is invested in the unlisted Lindsell Train company. That would be impossible with an OEIC and is one of the reasons I stress that investment trusts are NOT to be seen as having the same risk profile as OEICS.

In short investors, one might say, admittedly as a simplification, have invested in a trust the assets of which have been fully mortgaged to buy shares in the manager’s company! That strikes me as demonstrating huge enthusiasm for the Lindsell train business – in effect giving it an interest free loan in the hope that its shares will rocket in value.

Maybe they will – but do the bulk of small investors (a lot of share trades are in amounts of just a few thousands) actually understand the proposition? I hope so.

Filed Under: Basics

Reader Interactions

Click here to cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mid-month Musings – September 2026
  • Deep Dive – September 2026
  • Mid Month Musings with Mark (not me!)
  • Thank You
  • Deep Dive – August 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised