• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

Jack be nimble…

23rd July 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

I frequently read the word ‘nimble’ being used as an adjective to describe apparently desirable investment products. I just read it in a quote from a Portugese investment adviser, so this is not a UK specific trend, even if it is the English language.

The implication is that such funds will do better because they swap assets around quickly as a reaction to global events, financial or otherwise.

I am sorry to say that the idea of an investment fund being nimble is about as sensible as the idea of an oil tanker being nimble and being steered like a speedboat. It is nonsense.

Rant alert

What does ‘nimble’ mean? Well as implied by the heading I think of the word in the context of the children’s rhyme – ‘Jack be nimble, Jack, be quick, Jack jumped over the candle stick’ (referenced obscurely in that all time classic song, American Pie). So I take that to be pretty athletic!

Agile, quick moving, lively and so on come up in the dictionary.

Investment is a long term process. Investment funds are run to stated objectives and mostly against benchmarks which must be published. So they are typically only ever going to make small changes to their holdings in the very short term. Even if a multi asset fund reacts to say an interest rate change that was unexpected, the most it is likely to do is shave a few percentage points off an asset allocation and add the same somewhere else.

So if you get told that XYZ investment is selected because the manager is nimble, assume that the adviser has seen him or her on the dance floor! A fund that is flexible and relatively unconstrained in its asset allocation may be a good idea but calling it nimble is implying alacrity followed by bold, speedy changes of direction, when you are more likely to get a bit of ‘left hand down a bit’. Nimble it will never be!

As an aside, advisers often talk of ‘nimble’ funds at the same time as they are shoe horning clients into multi asset funds with very specific asset mixes that won’t change and yet are simultaneously selling out of a custom built portfolio where with some effort, reasonably prompt changes of asset mix could be made – not nimble, but at least purposeful. Smoke and mirrors.

Filed Under: Rants

Reader Interactions

Click here to cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mid-month Musings – September 2026
  • Deep Dive – September 2026
  • Mid Month Musings with Mark (not me!)
  • Thank You
  • Deep Dive – August 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised