• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

Monday mashup – it’s electrifying!

10th August 2020 by Mark Potter 2 Comments

(1978 song reference)

I am showing my age again – picking a phrase squealed by John Travolta’s character (not sure he actually did the singing) in the 1978 film Grease. I picked it because contrary to my expectations, the subject of electric cars and Tesla in particular has popped up in research I was doing today.

My plan has been to collect some data to see how the few global mid cap and small cap equity funds had done year to date relative to the well known and mainly large cap global equity funds (eg Fundsmith). By cap, I am referring to market capitalisation meaning the total value of the company’s listed shares. The range of companies quoted on markets is usually divided into large, mid, small and micro cap and there are different indices for these markets in many countries (eg the S&P 500 and The Russell 2000 in the USA – large and small cap indices).

When will they ever learn….? (1962 song reference)

I was however immediately diverted because I had started with North America as my research sector when my attention was drawn to the Baillie Gifford (BG) American funds whose recent performance has been incredible – and I use the word literally.

It is immediately obvious that this is largely because they have a very heavy weighting to Tesla shares. Now I don’t have enough data to know exactly when and at what price the BG manager bought the Tesla shares but it is possible he has made a profit of several 100 percent on his holding, contributing maybe 20-30% or even more to his year to date fund level return.

Now you probably know that Tesla is now valued as worth the same as Toyota, Volkswagen and Ford combined. Yet its much announced improved production of cars was in fact not much better than in 2018 and it only declared a small profit because it sold carbon credits to competitors.

The launch in the US of a single, narrow segment sports car from GM (the Corvette C8) is said to have generated more public interest than Tesla ever has (although there is no exact evidence, this is based on internet interactions) and yet I doubt if people who are not sports car fans like me have ever heard of the C8 Corvette.

It is indisputable that the value of the Tesla business in the stock market is absolutely nothing to do with its potential profitability from producing electric cars. I don’t know what it really is – I have yet to read a plausible explanation. So I just see it as a new tulip bulb (see Wikipedia – Tulip Mania 1637).

I mention this not because I want to warn you off buying Tesla stock – that is not within my area of expertise. I am using it as an example of why making fund comparisons on the basis of recent past performance is even more pointless than usual at this moment in time. In mid 2020, owning, or not owning just one or two stocks over the last few months would make a huge difference to relative performance.

I think my original objective will need to be modified and I will take a look at the longer term differences (if any) between funds defined by the market cap of their holdings. An update will follow!

Filed Under: Rants, Uncategorised

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jeffs says

    10th August 2020 at 1:12 pm

    Mark ,
    I have seen a review , I think in the Economist about 2 months ago, that gives another view on Tesla. The commentator agrees that the Tesla price is “wacky” BUT you should view it like Ocado.
    Ocado’s business is not really selling goods , but the package of an automated warehouse for retailers.
    Tesla is one of the only electric car manufacturers that own all the intellectual knowledge of making and developing electric vehicles . So their value is partly due to this “know how” which they could licence for any late comers to the electric business or those who are finding it economically challenging.
    Electric thought ?
    JEFF

    Log in to Reply
    • Mark Potter says

      10th August 2020 at 1:32 pm

      I am not so sure. There are actually many serious car manufacturers with very advanced technologies, like Porsche or Volvo/Polestar, never mind the US majors. They may not be so clever as Tesla but they have an existing market, better build quality (I believe) and a century of manufacturing experience. I am personally inclined to see Tesla as Betamax – the best quality, but not going to be the mass adoption product.
      Even if Tesla has an edge – I don’t believe it is worth that much when to be honest battery powered electric cars are not even an attractive solution to the sustainability issue – just arguably the best we have got for now.

      Log in to Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mid-month Musings – September 2026
  • Deep Dive – September 2026
  • Mid Month Musings with Mark (not me!)
  • Thank You
  • Deep Dive – August 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised