• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

Mark Potter

Monday mashup – over and out

8th March 2021 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Another change in my output!

Spring must be getting to your scribe – having changed the format of the monthly briefing, I now propose to change this regular blog slot to a new time.

It will become Midweek Musings, with posts most likely on Wednesday but not necesarily. In some weeks there will be more than one post.

The first new post will be this week.

A quick take on stock markets

One reason for the change is that I often want to comment on the state of stock markets and if I am writing early Monday, the news I have is from the week before, which occasionally is not ideal.

Last week saw a continuation of the pattern I identified in the Watching Brief . The markets are pricing assets on the basis of an inflationary economic recovery with rising central bank interest rates. This is because US bond yields are suggesting that is what is coming. That proposition does not fit in with all sorts of other facts, so possibly this will be a mini-tantrum.

If it is not, there will surely be more losses for fixed income investors and the price of gold may well head further down, although the latter would be an appropriate asset to own if there is runaway inflation. Equities will however turn around once a recovery is seen to be feeding through to profits.

It seems to me that there is nothing to lose by keeping calm and holding on to equities. I doubt if many of my readers own a heavy portfolio weighting in bonds (although be aware that if you own multi-asset funds, you will own more bonds in more cautious portfolios and they may not actually be lower risk at the moment).

Gold I have already commented on very recently and I think what an investor does with a physical gold holding will depend on whether it is a short term tactical holding (in which case it was a mistake with hindsight) or a long term asset mix diversifier.

Filed Under: Uncategorised

Watching Brief – March 2021

1st March 2021 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Pottering About

The end of February saw a distinctly nervous feel to global bond and equity markets, emanating from the USA.  The reason for this is for once obvious.

Stormy times ahead?

Markets have been taking account of rising long term yields on US Treasuries, a trend now around 6 months old.  This suggests a fear of over expansion from the multiple stimuli during the pandemic and a boom of sorts with inflation. 

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Members Only, Monthly commentary, Uncategorised

Monday Mashup – gold: hold or fold?

22nd February 2021 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

The price of gold bullion has declined steadily in US dollar terms for some months since its peak last Summer. A decline in the value of the dollar relative to Sterling will have added an extra loss for investors reading this post, and that includes me!

Readers who own gold bullion may therefore be asking the question in the title.

Why own gold and what about Bitcoin?

I own gold bullion because some 9 months or so back, I wanted to have an asset that was not correlated with global equities and would retain value if the pandemic got totally out of control. Fixed income and physical property investments did not look like offering much value then (and they still don’t) and there was obvious demand for gold.

Gold is a commodity and generally commodities (which include cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin) don’t pay an income and won’t be worth more because an enterprise does well. The price is directly and only determined by supply and demand.

Because high value minerals like gold and high complexity assets like Bitcoin are hard to mine and bring to the market (for completely different reasons of course), the supply side is known to be limited. So in making an investment bet on such assets, one is always taking a view on the demand side of the equation.

Money ‘rotates’ around asset classes over time

What’s changed?

This is the key to working out the completely opposite path of returns for gold and Bitcoin over the last few months. We have less demand for gold (more on that later) and more demand for Bitcoin.

The latter has a new champion with a big fan base in the form of Tesla’s Elon Musk, who has invested shareholders’ cash into Bitcoin in a big way.

The other reasons for Bitcoin demand rising I can only guess, but I would suggest it is possibly our old friend ‘herd mentality’, plus a bit more of a reported positive attitude from blue chip investment houses, although not reserve banks!

The reduction in demand for gold can be attributed to several factors. The main one is that the pandemic risk is thought to be much reduced, so avoiding national ‘fiat’ currencies is less important. Another is that interest rates on US treasuries are slowly rising, implying a market expectation of inflation and/or a slowing of US government money printing in the mid-term – surely inevitable.

Although gold is an excellent inflation proof asset in the long run, it has no income yield. When risk free (as is the convention) assets like US treasuries also have no yield and could lose capital value on a rate rise, gold looks attractive.

When interest yields pick up, the short term investor would rather have the income now than the inflation proofing later, so money rotates away from gold to lower risk (now improved) yield assets.

If such investors exected a sharp rise in interest rates, they would hesitate to buy the fixed income assets, because of the anticipated capital loss, so the markets are telling us that they only expect gentle rate rises over a long period. There is some debate about that, but the collective psychology of the market is always right for the time being!

So, what to do?

One could take the view that gold is a useful core portfolio asset, offering security and diversity and over the long term is both a volatility damper because of the low or even inverse correlation with global equities, and it will serve as an inflation hedge. In that case, it makes sense to keep a modest asset weighting.

Should you invest in crypto currencies instead?

I am not qualified to add to the view of regulators and cental bankers who suggest that although these new assets are very similar in character to precious metals, the way they are traded is probably not unlike the trading of the shiny stuff back in the 19th century at the ‘gold rush’ sites. Some people made fortunes, some went on to control large parts of the market and most people were financially wiped out. In other words, retail investors ought to stay away for now.

Another point of view would be that the vaccine programmes are going well, Covid-19 infections are coming down, there will be no real double dip recession and instead a consumer boom will drive up prices and in time interest rates. That proposition would imply that owning equities, even though they are currently expensive in many markets, or even well selected property assets, is a better tactical (ie short term) option and both fixed income and conventional commodities are not likely to make money.

If you are of the latter more optimistic frame of mind, you ought to think about controlling volatility in other ways within an equity portfolio. Investing in infrastructure is something that comes to mind, given that we expect high levels of government spending, or adding heavier weightings to healthcare funds, perhaps? I am not sure I know the full answer at the moment.

I did it my way?

As for me…..

You might expect me to tell you what I will be doing.

The answer is that I will not add to my physical gold holdings and as I have cash to put into the markets when I see opportunities, the relative weighting will go down.

Aside from that, I personally see no case for selling out, but my circumstances and portfolio will not be the same as yours, dear reader, so if you own gold, you need to make your own mind up!

I hope these comments help.

Filed Under: Asset Allocation, Monthly commentary, Portfolios

Monday Mashup – being an activist investor

15th February 2021 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

I will next month post a longer piece in the Watching Brief summarising the very interesting data I picked up from a Morningstar webinar on sustainable investing a couple of weeks back, but one of the key takeaways was that ESG (Environment, Sustainability and Governance) is a theme that has not just become mainstream, but is now potentially the leading selection criterion for many investors in Europe.

When marketing people can see that money is flowing in a certain direction, they create and adapt products to capture some of it. That introduces a risk of ‘greenwashing’ – the labelling of investment funds as being ESG ‘approved’ when in fact there is only a token adjustment in the fund manager’s investment processes.

Article on fossil fuel disinvestment

This is not a rant week exactly, but a subject on which I do have strong opinions.

I know some of my readers are very seriously concerned about climate change risk. So am I. I recently wrote a piece for another blog on the subject of disinvestment from fossil fuel busineses – an approach that is being widely adopted by pension funds and other institutional investors.

I am not sure that disinvestment will actually help that much.

You can now read my thoughts in detail as I have added the article to this website – here.

ESG commitment level measuring

As the leaders in fund classification and filtering for ESG criteria, Morningstar are aware that their established Sustainability Globes system is a little limited and I would say that it does not use strict enough criteria to allow final fund selections for those of us that want to know in some detail what sort of companies our money will be invested in.

Morninstar have on their own web site various articles about how their assessments work, going back as far as 2016. These can be found with simple Google searches. But an article of particular interest published recently explains their more rigourous and newer ESG commitment level ratings, something I only recently became aware of. Here is a link to it. You may have to select the link twice to get past the audience filter landing page and you will need a Morningstar Basic (free) membership.

I also have available for anyone interested a long and detailed report (US based) that was the background to a webinar on Climate Aware funds that I tuned into last year. It will not give UK investors a fund picklist but it does offer some insights into how much analysis actualy goes into understanding the carbon footprint of investment funds.

All this I think is great news for those who want to personally do something to help improve the prospects of humanity still being alive on the globe in future centuries: we can direct our money away from negative business activities and in a small way play our part in mitigating climate change.

Filed Under: Monthly commentary, Sustainability/ESG

Monday mashup – short and sweet

8th February 2021 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

What’s new? Not a lot this week.

The GameStop bubble duly deflated but the event brought to the regulators’ attention all sorts of issues about market manipulation. Some say the events of last week may be the death knoll for aggressive short selling hedge funds. If so, three cheers to that!

There are some slight hints that markets are seeing an economic recovery and maybe a little bit of inflation because yields on some fixed income stocks rose towards the end of last week. That fed through into a drop in the gold price, but I am doubtful that this is a developing trend.

Wot, no Bitcoin symbol?

Corporate results in the US seem in the main to be better than expectations, but the market is looking backwards only if it prices shares on that data alone.

Elon Musk appears to have acted even more bizarrely than usual in spending USD 1.5 billion on Bitcoin. As Tesla has only just become a cash flow generating business, I assume this is shareholder money. That raises an interesting question about companies doing what they are expected to in terms of business activity – perhaps he is taking the lead from Softbank?

Reasons to be cheerful, parts 1, 2, 3 and 4? I think not – more a case of reasons to observe rather than participate!

Filed Under: Monthly commentary

Watching Brief – February 2021

31st January 2021 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

You need to be logged in to view this content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Monthly commentary

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 49
  • Page 50
  • Page 51
  • Page 52
  • Page 53
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 97
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Deep Dive – November 2026 (Part 2)
  • Deep Dive – November 2026 (Part 1)
  • A little foresight?
  • Mid-Month Musings – Snippets
  • Deep Dive – October 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised