• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

Markets

May Watching Brief now published

8th May 2018 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

This is the regular market commentary that I have always intended to publish.  I have altered the format completely, so it now feels much like the presentation I would have made verbally to clients if I had been reviewing their portfolios as part of their service contract when I was their IFA.  That would have fed through to any necessary fund switches, sales or additions.

This change is the result of feedback received, so I hope it useful.  I have not restricted it to Member Only this month, so non-members can see if it might be helpful and justify signing up!  Here is a link.

Of course, this cannot be the same as a full review with an IFA, because that would conclude with personal recommendations, which I do not offer.  But if you have an IFA, this will give you something to take to the review meeting, or even to prompt an extra phone call.   If you are making all your own decisions and you are a subscriber, feel free to contact me if you want to disagree, or want to see any more evidence!

 

Filed Under: Announcements, Markets, Portfolios

The end of Abenomics? (m)

16th April 2018 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

It is reported that the long standing Japanese leader Shinzo Abe will resign, as a corruption scandal threatens to damage him and his party

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Education, Funds, Markets, Portfolios

Ebb and Flow

12th April 2018 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

I have the pleasure of looking over the River Neris from the terrace along one edge of my house.  The restful and usually peaceful view often assists my thinking.  As anyone familiar with the great works of literature or even the main religions of the world will know, there are not many tales that don’t at some stage involve a river. Two of the great rivers of the world get a mention in the very first chapters of the Bible, the very pen name of Mark Twain is derived from the language of the river and there are more examples of books that feature rivers heavily than I could possibly list.  See how many you can think of!

I mention this because a large powerful ever flowing river is a good analogy for global stock markets.  Most of the time it flows along with the level varying not much from day to day topped up by occasional rain and supporting the activities of all sort of dependent beings from fishermen and ducks to factories and hydroelectric schemes.  But at times the level changes more than usual and I have noted this happens in two main ways, which is the same for stock markets.

A less common but very noticeable event is a sudden increase or drop of several meters in the water level.  This is prompted by a single event or series of closely linked events – exceptional rainstorms or a call to release water rapidly through the dam of the downstream hydro electrical system, for example.   Generally such a rise or drop is reversed very quickly.  The 1987 stock market crash, or the correction in Summer 2015 would be analogous events.

More commonly there is a seasonal change in the long term weather pattern and the river rises gradually to eventually reach a flood level or declines until near drought conditions prevail.  In both the flood and drought outcomes the consequences are serious, but are only appreciated right at the end of the long process.  On  a day to day basis, the changes are not very noticeable and not even consistently in the same direction.

This is how it is with markets most of the time.  A very sharp correction can often be reversed almost immediately.  Long slow declines or periods of steady appreciation can seem almost endless and indeed the ‘inflection’ point when an underlying change in the long term background conditions is rarely detectable until after the event.  However, large amounts of money are made and lost by investors who are in reality not even paying much attention.

In my view we have passed the inflection point for the long rising market that started in 2008.  The conditions have changed – liquidity (a very appropriate word) is now flowing less freely and will be further constrained and the overall volume of wealth in the system is already shrinking.   Investors need to understand that and expect not to make money from rising river levels, as suggested by the famous saying “a rising tide floats all boats”, but from seeking out protected pools and rivulets fed from long nourished underground springs.  That requires rather more effort in exploring and researching.  Doing nothing will likely see wealth declining over a period of several years.

 

Filed Under: Education, Markets

What you should have bought on January 1st 2018

10th April 2018 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Hindsight is the only perfect vision, it is said.  The publishers of the FT Trustnet web site have recently put together some charts showing how various regions and asset classes have performed in terms of value changes so far this year.  It is not a pretty picture.

The only way you could have made good value from high level asset allocation decisions would have been

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Economics, Markets, Portfolios, Uncategorised

Facecbook and ESG

29th March 2018 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

The scandal around the use of data in the US elections and the BREXIT vote has increased awareness of what might be called “the age of data” (nod to the books by Yoval Noah Harari).  The concern is not that what data handers/processors do is commercially weak – in fact it appears to be ingenious.  You get loads of data from people by subtle manipulation of human nature at no cost and can use it to change the world to suit your objectives.  Almost the theme of a James Bond film, with much younger sweet faced villains!

The issue is one of ethics and social morality. Capitalism and politics don’t really do either of those very well, but they do like to try, more or less.   The current way the investment world assesses businesses on these counts is called ESG – Ethics, Social and Governance.  There are rankings for companies on these tests and some research suggests that companies with a good ESG score are actually better long term investments, as well as it feeling “nicer” to own them.

Facebook’s ESG score has slipped, no doubt, as for now has its share price.  But there is no doubt at all that data handling is a core global business (that the US and UK are doing especially well at, with Russia and China quite likely up there too)  and indeed owning data is an economic and political factor of significance in these times.  In the same way that banking is never going to be especially loveable as an activity, “big data” handlers are likely to be correctly seen as overly powerful elements in the developed world.  But we had better get used to living with that.

Filed Under: Economics, Markets

The FTSE at 7000 (ish) – the passive funds conundrum

22nd March 2018 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

I have a copy of a trade newspaper article printed in late 2007 reporting on a pre-Christmas survey of well known investment fund managers, most of whom are still working now. They were asked what they thought the level of the FTSE 100 index would be at the end of the next year.  The answers ranged quite widely, but several were above 7000.  The then current level was around 6400.

In fact the index fell 28% plus the next year.  And 11 years later it is trading in the range predicted by the optimists a decade ago!  If you were keen on passive index tracking funds in 2007, you would not have had a brilliant decade if you stuck to your FTSE 100 Tracker fund, although the dividend income would have been some consolation.

Don’t think this post is intended just to take a pop at passive funds – I see them as useful investments, if you know exactly what you are getting, and they are low cost.

The FTSE 100 is what is called market cap weighted, which has two main implications:   a minority of large shares influence its performance and the mix of shares in the index changes over time.  So the FTSE 1000 index valued at 7000-ish now is a completely different mix of shares to the one being speculated about at the end of 2007.

In fact, buying the index is a certain way of buying the past performace of businesses, which is what has driven up their share values and got them into the 100 highest value listed businesses in the the UK.  So it can and does often include some shooting stars that will quickly die and fade.  In deference to my football fanatic ex-colleague, I often refer to them as Wimbledons!

It might sound like investing in a list of Britain’s top companies is a straightforward lower risk decsion for beginner investors, but that is yet another investment myth.

Filed Under: Education, Markets, Uncategorised Tagged With: Markets

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 34
  • Page 35
  • Page 36

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mid-month Musings – September 2026
  • Deep Dive – September 2026
  • Mid Month Musings with Mark (not me!)
  • Thank You
  • Deep Dive – August 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised