• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

Markets

Radio Silence!

8th October 2018 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

There have been no new posts on the site for a couple of weeks because I have been on holiday!  I was in the UK, France and Italy and could claim I was doing important on location research on  Brexit, the potential troubles with the Euro and so on.  But mainly I was enjoying the food and drink (at least on the South of the Channel)!

I did in fact get some anecdotal evidence of what people in France and Italy worry about in terms of economics and politics and that is definitely not Brexit.

The October news and comment will be published very shortly when I will address the current investment climate and the prospects for investors.

Filed Under: Announcements, Markets

Lehman Bros – 10 years on

11th September 2018 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

September 15th 2018 will mark the 10 year anniversary of the event that history will record as triggering the financial crisis that was followed by global reactions that would have been seen as impossible in earlier times.  Most developed economies moved their central bank rates to be net negative (in real terms) and central banks became the largest buyers of fixed income securities that have ever been seen, adding trillions to their balance sheets and effectively the same amount of new liquidity to the money markets.  Money printing is not really the best shorthand, but that is what the average person easily understands as being the process.

It is perhaps disappointing to politicians and especially the top central bankers that they are not thanked much for acting to prevent a recession like that of the 1930s.    However, the consequences of these actions have not yet fully worked their way through.  Some have been good for many people – asset prices have risen as would be expected when there is loads more cash sloshing around.  But because austerity was an accompanying part of the economic package in many major economies, there have been negative consequences for those who have no assets, or whose main asset is their human capital – their ability to sell their labour.  Wages have not risen much because of contemporary changes in technology, society and the relative power of the socialist vs capitalist elements in politics.

It is in fact a rather unfortunate irony of the post financial crisis world that the solutions adopted to sort out the mess directly caused by irresponsible financial engineering – the invention of extra fictitious assets for those who already had plenty of assets – is in fact an application of more short term financial engineering.   This is like giving the drunk guy another bottle of vodka because you feel sorry for him.

It is also much the same as the high interest rate lender offering a consolidation loan to the person who has got in a mess and can’t pay their credit card and bank loan instalments, knowing that they will struggle with the monthly cost but that there are valuable assets to be had if they default.  The world remains relatively Dickensian.

The respected fund manger Edward Bonham-Carter (c0-founder and formerly managing director at Jupiter) recently made the point (in a piece about this 10 year anniversary) that global indebtedness is now at astronomic levels.  In some emerging markets the stress of such debt is being thrown into sharper focus by the rising value of the dollar and less than stable politics (Argentina and Turkey).  But debt in much larger economies is gigantic in comparison.

Most of the warning signs that preceded the last stock market collapse are now flashing, some quite urgently.   As always the market won’t correct itself by slowing down gently and having a long pause, even if a proportion of participants know when to start taking defensive measures.  It occurred to me once that maturity is knowing which drink is the last one you can have before you lose control and get ridiculously drunk with all the negative consequences.  Most global stock markets have had that last ‘sensible’ drink.  Some more drinking will no doubt raise a further temporary feeling of joy without consequences, but the hangover will be nasty.

Filed Under: Economics, Markets

Conflicting expert opinion

20th August 2018 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Yes, this is one of those times when I get as close as I ever do to those folk who issue Tweets they either wish they had thought more about, or which everyone else wishes they had thought more about.  I don’t use Twitter, because I am by nature  an exponent of the long way round with words, except when it comes to music lyrics.

I am going to rant a bit, but in a hopefully educational way.

Today Morningstar sent me an investor bulletin. In it they point out the useful and interesting fact that dividends grew very healthily last year in all the major global markets.  Any investment professional knows that the cardinal driver of share prices is dividend growth, so that suggests share prices at what otherwise seem to be rather high levels based on macro economic and historic data might well be justified.

On the same page, they say US shares are overvalued and that it is a good idea to sell overvalued shares.  In that article they go on to say that they are NOT recommending selling US shares.  They also say (correctly) that you should never sell shares on the basis of news headlines.  In their view tariffs won’t impact the US market as the US has a high domestic focus and is not too much impacted by international trade, so ignore that news.  Might one ask why the US President is imposing tariffs in the first place if that is true?

A rational line of advice might be this:  current shares prices are high because we have seen (past tense) excellent dividend growth.  In a world where tariffs will have some impact on local costs (absolutely without doubt) and there is full employment and pressure on wages in many producer countries and also rising interest rates, profits will grow less, dividends will grow less or even get cut and share prices will indeed look expensive.

I am relatively pessimistic, which as I am naturally an optimist, means that for me I am very concerned about current share price valuations in many places.  But there will be buying opportunities, something Morningstar does point out to give them credit.  As I have been saying for some months now, holding cash patiently is a good tactic.

Filed Under: Education, Markets, Portfolios

Cold Turkey?

13th August 2018 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

In today’s news about the financial pressure being exerted on Turkey by the Trump administration, two blog posts I have made recently are brought together.

Currency fluctuation is a risk that can impact all portfolios

This is as I explained:  because many emerging economies have large amounts of US dollar denominated debt, the cost of servicing that debt goes up if the dollar appreciates relative to the currency of the debtor nation.  That is one of those ‘rule of thumb’ justifications for selling emerging market and broadly Asian stocks (although not logical for Japan and China, at least).

Tariffs have unpredictable consequences

In this case, tariffs aimed at Turkey (because they are not being nice to Donald, it seems), may lead to default on debts owned mainly by international banks, thus awakening sleeping concerns about the liquidity of the financial system when central bank money printing ends.

Thoughts

Turkey is not a small country and of course was once a significant regional power, so is unlikely to allow itself to be pushed around.  It talks about new alliances with Russia, although allowing for not such ancient history, one would not see the two countries as likely best mates.  But ‘need is must’ sometimes as the saying goes and I am sure President Putin would like more influence South West of the Black Sea.

A worry is that US foreign policy is now so ignorant that Trump sees Turkey as just another Middle Eastern country (because it is Islamic) and therefore a natural enemy of the US.  As I write that is seems bizarre, but I do believe it is possible!

It would be odd if this particular non-sensical action by Trump caused the market sell off that is rather overdue, but it will be a nervous few days.  Investors should keep an eye on events and be prepared to take any buying opportunities.

As a final thought, the Euro has been quoted as depreciating in today’s news as a contagion effect from the  Turkish currency crisis.  But it has hardly moved against Sterling – an indication of how uncertain an option the UK appears to international traders as the Brexit dithering continues.  The Pound looks likely to continue to fall against the US dollar so portfolio exposure to global trading businesses will benefit.

Filed Under: Economics, Markets, Portfolios

It’s not cricket!

21st July 2018 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Talking about India – ups and downs

I am a follower of cricket and of course the highly regarded Indian cricket team is touring in the UK at the moment.  England came out top of the one day international series but it was a good fight.   India is also seen as a rapidly developing emerging investment market and has been a destination for large flows of investment funds in recent years.  Of course, Brits know that Indian businesses can be large operations with multi national subsidiaries these days owning chunks of British industry, including such gems as Jaguar Land Rover.

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Funds, Markets, Members Only

Why I don’t buy individual listed shares

13th July 2018 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

ASOS

I notice today that shares in the on-line retailer ASOS fell 11% or so when it announced it was only going to grow sales by 25%.  This is classically what happens when a share is priced on the basis of future profits growth, not current earnings.  So although ASOS sells clothes, its shares are valued more like a tech company.

A little basic analysis

Bloomberg, the market data and analysis business, is estimating that profits at ASOS might make GBP100 million this year.  Not bad, but not much on a market capitalisation of over GP4 billion.  The price to earnings ratio published in over 70!  Norms are in the range 10 to 20, by the way.

I also read that the company will spend about 3 times the profits estimate on new warehousing capacity (not in the UK, of course, because of Brexit).  I did not quickly find out where it gets the money to pay for that.

A graph of the share price shows that investors who bought in after the last price crash would have done very nicely, but in my view the valuation is propped up by momentum not any recognised sign of good value or dividend prospects.  You get a 1% or so yield for taking a huge risk.

Many of the shares will be held in large blocks by investing institutions and if they sell off the momentum reversal will see the price fall like a stone.  A 50% loss is more than feasible, although I have no way of knowing that will actually happen.  I am just using this as a classic example.

But maybe…

Some might think that the past results, the quality of the management, the changes in shopping patterns or similar mean that the share price has further to go.  In the near term, that could be right.   I would prefer that call to be made by a professional fund manager with access to all the latest data and maybe the opportunity to talk to the company’s top management.  Best of all, I would like my fund manager to have bought the share after the last price collapse and now sold out on a large gain!

11% down?

Personally, I could tolerate my portfolio falling 11% over a few weeks in the event of a global stock market correction – what is called systemic risk, because I know that will be reversed over time and I can live on my reserve assets.  But losing 11% in a day and maybe much more permanently is not a risk I think anyone should take without having plenty of other resources.  I will be sticking to my portfolio of diversified funds.

Filed Under: Education, Markets

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Page 35
  • Page 36
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mid-month Musings – September 2026
  • Deep Dive – September 2026
  • Mid Month Musings with Mark (not me!)
  • Thank You
  • Deep Dive – August 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised