• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

Markets

Pondering about a post Brexit world

27th March 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Having been pretty nervous and indeed pessimistic about the direction of stock markets for nearly 12 months now, I am beginning to think about what investors ought to do now we are very close to getting a resolution of some sort (ie more certainty about what will happen) on Brexit.

Once any really concrete decisions are made, currency and stock markets will react very fast, so it will pay investors to have at least thought about what options they have for action. I am assuming that most sensible investors will have taken some profits from their portfolios in 2018 or even this Spring and have some cash to invest. Those who do not still need to think about the implications for their asset mix and fund holdings.

Forming a policy for action is in my opinion a process: I don’t have any magic intuition as to what to do! So a starting point is to consider possible scenarios and then assess the way they might, most probably, pan out.

The little grey cells are working away….

For this post, as a starting point, I am going to over simplify a little and suggest there are two possible situations after a final Brexit plan is settled (or possibly even no Brexit!). One is that the markets are relieved and like the outcome and the other is naturally that they are horrified and there is a ‘flight to safety’.

If the former situation prevails, the pound will likely strengthen and UK shares may come back into favour – the shares in the UK outside of the big global players in the FTSE 100 are oversold (ie cheap) at the moment. That would suggest it would be a good time to buy global stocks as they will be cheaper and my judgement, a rising pound would be short lived as reality sets in. As a result the overseas stocks will benefit from a windfall gain in currency terms later on. Some selected UK funds would look like a good bet too – those most hammered in late 2018, broadly investing in ‘value’ shares.

If the markets sell off and the pound tumbles, then it would be unwise to invest in shares valued in other currencies using a low value pound and there will likely be the afore-mentioned cheap investments to be bought in the UK, but they could be at real bargain prices. This is based on the observation that markets over-react to major changes in the global economy.

As to fixed income holdings (bonds), these are likely to benefit from extra demand if investors are really worried. That would push prices up. However, they are already expensive. It is also hard to know in what direction central banks will move interest rates in either scenario (not at all would be the highest probability in my view), so that is a good reason for not buying into bonds – there is a risk of sharp losses if interest rates rise more than the market has allowed.

In summary, I see opportunities to put cash to work as soon as we have decisions clear enough for markets to re-position. But I would not join any reaction of fear by buying bonds and that means avoiding most cautious managed funds.

Filed Under: Education, Markets

In or out? Deal or no deal?

6th March 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

As we approach some critical dates in terms of global financial risk, I have been asked about the pros and cons of being “out of the market”. By that I mean having all or a large part of your portfolio in cash.

FOMO

The obvious disadvantage in recent times to holding cash is that it generates a very low return, but that is usually taken as read and the ‘quid pro quo” for not carrying the risk of a loss of capital value. What people worry about in addition is the possibility that the market might go up a worthwhile amount while they are not fully invested. Our old friend FOMO – the fear of missing out.

Actually, it is good that people have this worry. Recent data from the Financial Conduct Authority shows that a high proportion of people who access their pension fund to get out the tax free lump sum, then go on to leave the balance in cash or a totally unsuitable default investment fund. This really reduces the chance of their pension being even as good as an insurance company pension annuity.

Let’s go!

Before going anyway, know from where you are starting!

For those who want to know whether it is sensible to have loads of cash, some cash or no cash in their portfolio, I would suggest that one ought to think about where we are in the market cycle. In other words how are markets valued – have they been going up for ages, have they just collapsed, or something else?

An example

I will explain this with an example. Let’s say there is 40% of a well diversified portfolio in cash The rest is exposed to what we will call the ‘market’ although in reality returns will come as an average from lots of differing assets.

Let us say ‘markets’ are currently near an all time peak and we assess the possible further increase in the next 12 months as being a maximum of 10% – we read of strategists predicting “high single digit returns’ (they really do say that sort of thing).

So if 40% of our money misses out on a 10% return, we will only get 6%. and will have missed out on 4%.

If the market is really high, we can say from past experience that a setback of 30% plus is also entirely feasible. If the market fell 30%, we would lose 60% of 30%, so 18%. That means our cash reserve has ‘earned’ 12%: the amount we did not lose.

Clearly in this example, which reflects where we are now in my opinion, the risk/return ratio is not symmetrical. There is a better risk/return ratio on holding cash than not.

Why then would I not suggest holding 100% cash? The reason is that if we had all the portfolio in cash the ‘missed return’ if the market went up would be the full 10% and that might be psychologically painful. In other words, we need to get as near as we can to having our cake and eating it, or to hedge our bets and the desired balance will vary from person to person.

Some people might say it is fine to miss out on 10% upside after a very good run, rather than take the risk of a 30% loss, especially if they need access to the investment quite soon.

I must emphasise that if markets had recently sold off, like in 2008, the estimates in the example would have to be quite different. Perhaps not surprisingly, at such times people want to carry on holding cash (another recognised psychological bias) and in fact they really need to be brave.

Surely, there is a clever option?

Not Harry
Eureka?

It would be great if there were assets you could buy that gave you a modest return and went in the opposite direction to the main investment markets. Clever people have been working on that for many years and almost completely failed. What is available is complicated and hard to analyse. I have commented on Absolute Return funds in other posts and the article ‘Real World Risk’ may interest you.

Even if you could buy an asset that always went in exactly the opposite directions to stock markets (to a degree you can if you understand derivatives), then if you put 50% of your money into that asset you would only ever make a zero or lower (because of costs) return because the two parts would cancel each other out!

Cash is still the best defensive asset and the opportunity cost of holding it is best thought of as an insurance premium well worth paying when risks are high.

With insurance, when the house has burned down to the ground, you don’t pay the premium again until you have re-invested in a new structure! If the site is just a charred heap of rubble or two years, there is no need for insurance. So after a market sell off, cash can get switched to assets that are nice and cheap!

There are other ways of dealing with the loss of return from a cash element in a portfolio notably the ‘bar bell’ approach, where some high risk assets are retained at the other end of the portfolio volatility range and then if markets do shoot up, they make a geared return that compensates for the dull cash element not contributing much. Because the return is ‘geared’, or much greater than the market average, you don’t need to have as much money in such assets and if things go wrong you won’t lose much.

Such strategies require a good knowledge of markets and asset types or a skilled adviser. Some ready made multi asset funds will use this strategy, but it is not commonplace.

In conclusion

In simple terms, a good adviser will help you fight your natural psychological biases. You will need to hold cash after making sales to bank profits following long periods of growth and conversely to invest rapidly after a market sell off. You won’t want to do either, but if you can be persuaded, your long term returns will be rather better.

Filed Under: Basics, Markets

Pump and Dump?

19th February 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

If the title of this post is a mystery to you, let me explain:

A pump and dump operation is a fraudulent manipulation of asset prices, usually individual shares, to make a large profit from naïve investors.

Essentially, the fraudster will buy a large number of shares that are cheap because the investee business is practically worthless. They then use a variety of illegal or shady methods to increase the price. These will usually include a hard sell over the telephone to vulnerable investors with a fake story attached, placing sales with friends who will sell out later and inventing news. As demand for the shares increases and the price starts to move rapidly because the fraudster may own a large part of the total shares available for sale but only actually sells a moderate amount at this stage, more and more greedy participants can be persuaded to enter the market.

When the fraudster has unloaded enough shares to drive the price up to an implausible level, he or she and friends will rapidly sell off the large remaining stock they have. A drop in the share price initially as liquidity improves may even make unwise buyers think they are now getting a bargain!

All that glitters is not gold….

The fraudsters bank a large profit and the share price collapses very fast, leaving many inexperienced investors with shares that are almost impossible to trade and therefore worth very little.

I mention this now because it feels to me like global stock markets are operating such a wheeze right now, albeit collectively and without a fraudulent intent.

I suggest this because global equity markets, those investing in company shares, have risen to levels last seen in the mid Autumn and seem to be heading relentlessly up. But there is no change in the global economic climate to justify this. In fact most real news is negative and many of the underlying risks are actually greater.

Many commentators are struggling to explain what element of the combined human psyche is responsible. Some say that the US and China are bound to do a good trade deal. Others say that the likelihood of the UK crashing out of the EU is reduced (although for the life of me, I can’t follow their logic). Others say that although profits are beginning to shrink and dividends might slip back, this is only happening slowly and basically ‘everything is all right’. Some point to central banks being rather worried, so potentially slowing rate rises (that is good news?!)

My feeling is that we have a situation that might be equated to the mindset of a gambling football supporter betting on his or her usually top flight team winning a major competition when they have managed to make it through the early rounds, even though the manager has just been sacked, the best players sold off and until a recent cup run, this year’s league results have been pretty rubbish. Because such a person needs a boost to justify their support, they will bet on the win. The idea of a loss after several years of glory is just too depressing. I think many stock market participants are talking up the market because the alternative is just too gloomy to contemplate.

This is worrying, because if there is a correction back to a new harsher reality, the big players will take their money off the able in a flash, at their pumped up prices, and we small investors will be left holding a lot of assets that have just been dumped. Time to increase cash weightings further? Personally, I think that would be prudent for anyone who does not cope well with short term volatility – and that will be most people.

Filed Under: Education, Markets

Brexit – implications for investors now

16th January 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

The stock market reaction to last night’s drama in the House of Commons is muted so far, both locally and globally (I write this at around midday on January 16th). Sterling has strengthened which has been explained by no less than Mark Carney as evidence that the markets believe that a Hard Brexit is less likely and a delayed Brexit is on the cards, allowing a more sensible deal to be done.

I was a Remainer and given that I have chosen to live in Europe as an EU citizen, I can only confess to blatant self interest. I also voted for the first time ever in 1975 to join the EEC and still believe in the post war idea of a stable Europe being more likely with formal economic and social unity. I know that is not an argument everyone likes but I see much good week in week out in the projects for young people that are made possible by the EU.

As a financial and investment expert (sorry Mr Gove), I did and still do genuinely believe that Brexit was always going to cause economic damage to the UK in the short term. If anyone ever wants to know why, I can explain in great detail! Over the longer term, I can see both sides of the argument. I would have preferred the threat of a Brexit referendum to have been used in collaboration with the other EU countries who don’t like the Brussels set up, to seek reforms. Also I would have preferred some honesty all round.

I do agree with something said by many – that the decision of the referendum ought to be carried through, unless there is a second referendum as a result of a genuine public desire for one. It is not for Parliament to simply stop the process because the Government has proved to be an utterly incompetent negotiator. I suggest it is better for Brexit to happen, the consequences be dealt with (and I think they will mostly not be happy) and perhaps a new relationship with the EU established after a period of reflection.

Here I point out roughly where I live and why I can see Europe and the UK a little differently.

I understand very well the arguments for and against EU immigration because my parents and sister live in Lincolnshire and I personally know people of all ages who have come to the UK from Eastern Europe (many have returned now but some hold very well paid jobs in major businesses and public bodies) and also seen first hand that working in the UK has been an economic choice for young people with English language skills. It is definitely not the first choice any more for the brighter kids and places like Germany, Norway and even the USA will be getting skilled young workers who would have come to the UK.

What can investors expect? The first point I need to repeat is that Mrs May’s deal and whatever replaces it, unless that is a Hard Brexit, represent the beginning of the exit process, not the process itself. There will be many hurdles to overcome, some bonuses and some unexpected complications. Change involves risk and cost – always! So I remain pessimistic about levels of volatility, especially as currency exchange rates are much more a part of the risk assessment that they used to be. I am not rushing to invest anywhere in the world.

On the plus side, Britain has a developed economy with strong control mechanisms and an enterprise culture so a sell off on grounds of uncertainty only will throw up bargains as excellent businesses will have their share prices marked down below the levels justified by their profit and dividend paying potential. That implies a case for investing in the UK in stock picking ‘special situations’ and smaller companies funds.

Personally, I have already dipped my toe in the water by buying a small weighting in a leading UK small companies fund and been rewarded by a sharp loss to date! That is often what happens when one tries to see through the fog and into the future. More often than not, an initial set back precedes several years of excellent returns!

Filed Under: Economics, Markets

Worse and worse, or opportunity knocks?

31st December 2018 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

I have to close the year with a blog post noting, after looking at my own portfolios, that the serious risks I have emphasised since the early Summer have wrought even more havoc than I expected. I am known as an optimistic, so when my comments had started to turn pessimistic I had been told that things must be really bad. Indeed they are.

Of course, I am pleased that some of the ‘insurance’ built into the portfolios is working well, notably the highest ever weighting to cash. The ‘works when you need it most’ holding in the Jupiter Absolute Return fund is also doing what it should. No one who reads my words of acclaimed wisdom should be needing to sell assets at the moment.

When will it get better? Not soon in my opinion because none of the major political risks have reached a hiatus. But if things get much worse, there will shortly be a great opportunity to start in to the next 10 years of making money – as long as you have cash and courage!

So, the optimist in me still lives on! There is always opportunity around the corner when there is a sell off and this time I hope we are all ready for it.

Happy New Year!

Filed Under: Markets

Spot the trend!

17th December 2018 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

If I told you I am using wood pellets from Russia to heat my house you might instantly think I am eco minded or getting a government subsidy or both.  The former is true but not the latter but neither are the actual reason:  the house I bought had a granular pellet boiler installed already because that is the most practical fuel option.  Russian wood pellets are the best quality and the price is sensible.

The reason why you might have guessed at the reasons I suggested is because you may be aware of a trend towards using bio-mass as a fuel on the basis of the (contested) argument that it is carbon neutral.  Trends reflect a general direction of change that has impacted enough people or processes or just data to suggest a long term impact.  The word trendy implies keeping up with changes in fashion that have become set in.

Knowing about trends in a mathematical or statistical sense is useful when looking to assess the likely direction of stock market asset prices.  In fact there is a whole industry built around the concept, called generally ‘charting’.  The number one blunt instrument of the chartist is something called the ‘moving average’ which seeks to strip out short term ups and downs in valuation and show how the direction of data is progressing in a nice smooth way.

There are different ways of adding such ‘trend’ lines to charts and the various methods of interpreting them.  The interpretation can sometimes  seem as improbable as astrology but as one might assume human behaviour across a very wide base of participants does not change much, patterns might exist, I concede.  I would however suggest that most charting methods are in fact naïve and useless because they do not account for the exact features prevailing in the financial climate of the time.

Graphs and charts are only any use if you know how they were constructed and how to interpret them

Where the trend is useful is in looking at turning points, which can never easily be detected at the time they happen.  Looking backwards and spotting quite soon the start of a new trend (an inflection point) can help one see what risk and opportunities are current. Investment fund managers often claim they are good at seeing inflection points in share prices.

An easy way to make some personal use of this concept without being a statistician is to get up a graph from a news service like the BBC of a major stock market like say the FTSE 250 (this is broader based than the 100) over a long period like 5 years.  Such charts are drawn with not too many data points so short term oscillations disappear. That can be very informative.  If you do it now, you will see we are well into a ‘bear’ market but could have some way yet to go down the slope!

Filed Under: Education, Markets

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 30
  • Page 31
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 36
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mid-month Musings – September 2026
  • Deep Dive – September 2026
  • Mid Month Musings with Mark (not me!)
  • Thank You
  • Deep Dive – August 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised