• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

Markets

The lies have it

20th May 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Investment fund managers are usually well educated people and the best ones have talent and intelligence too. Sometimes it is interesting to read what they publish about their own research, which can be very wide ranging.

A fund I have known for many years, in fact even in forms before it got its current name, is the Jupiter Absolute Return fund. This is run by Dr James Cluney, who got his PhD researching the processes of stock market shorting in the UK and elsewhere. His fund tends to be a sort of parachute, slowing portfolio losses when things are really going wrong, but being a bit of extra weight to carry when markets are soaring away.

He correctly predicted the market sell off in 2018 and more or less protected his investors from losses. This year, he has lost money and although that is to be expected if markets go up when logically they shouldn’t, I wanted to see if he had commented on the reasons. Investors may be tempted to sell out if they just read the recent numbers.

I have not so far found a very recent article or interview but I did find a fascinating and indeed quite insightful piece into how share valuations are now influenced by what is a called the ‘narrative’ effect. Essentially this is the flow of news, both true and ‘managed’ (ie to suit the issuer’s purpose) that is available from both traditional sources and more often than ever, social media.

For example, he explains that he has been ‘shorting” Tesla shares, so he is one of the people Elon Musk hates. On every technical measure used by fund mangers, shorting Tesla shares is logical, but we know that Elon Musk does his utmost (including illegally recently) to pump up the Tesla share price by using media of all types, essentially trying to control the Tesla news narrative. We can’t him blame for that unless he wonders off into telling ‘porkies’!

Another example might be the floatation of Lyft and Uber. In the case of Uber, we even had the company complying with the law by stating it may never make a profit, but so managing the other ‘facts’ (most of which are irrelevant when examined carefully) that is raised billions of pounds from investors who may never get paid a dividend! That it stretching optimism to its limits and beyond.

As a cautious fund manager, whose objective is to preserve client capital, Dr Cluney has to take a view about whether he can afford to stick to his convictions based on real data and yet, at least for now, see share prices move in line with what is basically propaganda, or give up and ‘go with the flow’. I wrote another post recently about the option of momentum investing, for members.

In his article he expresses concern that as people follow the lead of the US president by manipulating the facts, telling straight lies and blustering, then it becomes difficult to make decisions based on facts, because there may be more information around that is pure ‘fog’ designed to hide the reality from investors than it is possible to see through. One might add that like many motorway drivers there are plenty of investors happy to carry on at full speed even though they have no idea what is a few dozen meters ahead of them.

As Mr Musk found out, blatantly ‘pumping’ a share price with a misleading announcement will be punished by regulators. However, there are techniques that may not be so easily spotted. According to Dr Cluney, algorithmic research tools read words in media content and make positive or negative judgements according to the words counted. But people working in the investor relations departments of businesses know that! So they can use their writing skills to fill up press releases, tweets and other social media posts with positive words, even if out of context (algorithms not being so intelligent) and get a share onto broker ‘buy’ lists even when the underlying truths was negative!

As usual, we can’t know what will cause the next market crash – it is usually one of the ‘unknown unknowns’. But I would have a small bet on fiction having at least temporarily defeated fact being major contributor.

Filed Under: Education, Funds, Markets

Up, up and away?

13th May 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Readers may have noticed that global stock markets, especially the US markets, seem very resilient to bad news. The stalling of talks on a US/China trade deal have whittled off part of this calendar year’s upside, but that is only some 3% against an 18% or so gain. There appears to be optimism in the US that the Chinese will cave in (but the Americans don’t really have an objective view in my opinion).

A comment from a trader quoted by Bloomberg today possibly reflects the attitude of some participants. To paraphrase – after a strong rise in markets a 7% or so setback is to be expected and investors need to focus not on the worries that caused the setback, but on what price is low enough for them to buy more of their favourite stocks.

That is frankly over optimistic (I put it politely). Of course, we know markets can move with momentum and that will usually push them both up and down beyond the right price relative to the value on offer. But momentum reverses and it is unwise not to remember that.

An interesting fact in the UK balance of trade data (the worst ever) published last week was that a larger than average chunk of the import balances was purchases of gold.

I have said before that if a significant number of investors with big money are not so confident about markets, it usually shows in the direction of the gold price. The relative balance of buyers to sellers is of course the main driver of that price, so maybe that bit of data is an indicator that in the UK a least, people are beginning to hedge their market positions more than they have been.

On reviewing the range of data I have seen of late, I can’t say I would want to rush in and top up my investments at current prices, or even at 7% lower prices. I have commented in other recent (member only) posts on options for speculating a little at the end of a bull market cycle, but the easy option is to hold plenty of cash and wait until there are rock bottom prices!

Filed Under: Markets, Trading

May Watching Brief Published (m)

6th May 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

My observations for the month of May are now available.

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Announcements, Markets, Portfolios

Where were you in 1987?

24th April 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

A PS to my recent posts about markets rising when conventional logic says they are too expensive.

Bloomberg today reported that the start to this year has been the best one for the S&P500 since …… 1987.

If you are too young to remember stock markets in 1987 (or for that matter the weather in October that year) refer to Google.

Filed Under: Education, Markets, Trading

Reasons to be cheerful?

17th April 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

This year has seen strong rises in most stock markets and previously I have commented that this seems mysterious given all the main risks remain unabated.

I have remained relatively pessimistic largely because of the evidence of company reports and the trend in profits, as well as some plain barmy pricing of new companies coming to market, which has all suggested a disconnection between market sentiment and valuation.

Recently, markets have reacted positively to economic news:

Growth in various major economies, low levels of unemployment, Brexit deferred, low inflation and so on.

Now I will always say that there is no connection in reality between news about economic data (which is often selective and misleading) and the likely long term valuation of investments. Chinese business confidence picking up is for example probably only due to a worried Chinese state pushing banks to lend heavily to the commercial sector!

Of course, real changes like say a US/China trade deal that reduces tariffs will be good for businesses and probably profits, dividends and share prices in selected business sectors. That is a concrete event, something ending with a decent outcome.

But one significant and real measure of secure economic growth is action by central banks to control it – putting up interest rates. That is not happening and in fact recent decisions suggest rate rises are being pushed back.

Retaining cash while markets keep rising requires an iron discipline. Remember that you have other money invested, so even if markets are not going to fall back, you will only miss out on returns on a portion of your funds. That cost is an insurance premium.

Personally, having lived through this sort of market valuation pattern at the turn of the Millennium, I am happy to buy insurance and keep plenty of cash ready for a sell off. I still think the probability remains on the balance of the known facts. New purchases might be made cautiously on the ‘drip feed’ basis, but I am not even contemplating that yet.

Filed Under: Education, Markets

Brexit Delay – implications for investors

15th April 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

The Brexit show moves on like a cup of tea – an analogy I heard used by a Lithuanian political commentator. The idea being that you can leave the tea bag in the cup (UK in Europe) as long as you like now, up until October 31st anyway, and when you take it out will just mean the tea is stronger or weaker, hotter or colder. All a matter of (political) taste.

The immediate reaction of stock markets is a bit like that of the woman to the noisy arrival of a husband who has come home drunk so many times now, it is only remarkable if he comes home sober!

So what might shock markets would be some well supported concrete decisions from the UK government and some definite changes with actual guaranteed dates attached.

In the short term, we will need to see if Mrs May is really prepared for a fight with the hard Brexiteers and if she is prepared to seeks an element of support from the Opposition in defeating them. That would be pragmatic but I personally think not very likely.

The typical English politician after a Brexit voting night in Westminster? Or the markets drunk to oblivion with Brexit news?

Should investors assess the markets as now carrying less risk? Absolutely not. Other economic news has got worse. Markets may rise in the short term because they are set in that groove, but growth in asset prices like we have got used to is unsustainable and I would be using any unexpected spike up to bank more profits.

If you disagree and want to buy the cheapest assets, then probably certain segments of the UK market are the best value, but I would only drip feed money in very slowly.

On the currency front, which is still a very relevant consideration in the light of global trade disturbances, one should look to see where interest rates will rise first and the US is not so much the certainty that it was. Trump may well be pressurising the Fed not to do what it ought to in the light of US economic data. How long that can last is anyone’s guess.

Having said that, if I were buying global funds at the moment I would concentrate on global players with plenty of cash in hand and incomes and share prices in US dollars. As a diversifier for higher risk investors, Japan looks logical.

Filed Under: Markets

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Page 31
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 36
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mid-month Musings – September 2026
  • Deep Dive – September 2026
  • Mid Month Musings with Mark (not me!)
  • Thank You
  • Deep Dive – August 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised