• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

Education

Boris’s plan matures

17th October 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

I wrote at the beginning of the month that Boris Johnson was going to maximise his chances of winning an election and I have to hand to him and his team – he has done it with some skill.

Off we go – Happy Halloween!

He has done what most English people I know think was necessary – tell the DUP that he can do without them if they are not going to offer any flexibility. That has allowed him to cut a deal and the fact that to do it, he made modest concessions will not do him any harm as most people are now just longing for the end of the process. The Europeans seem happy with it too.

He can put it to Parliament not really caring if they reject it – a rejection will now be seen by the majority of the British public and the right wing press as churlish and the EU heads of state will give up on the British democratic process.

If the deal is passed (which I think is the lesser probability without a big block of Labour MPs disobeying their Whips), then all well and good and although the path ahead is not easy, at least everyone at lasts knows that they can make a start.

If the deal is not passed, the PM will write a letter requesting an extension, but the EU will refuse it, in my judgment and I think in the minds of his advisers. I think the Tory stategists have always seen this as the ultimate scenario.

They (EU representatives of all sorts) have pretty much said that much in advance. If the only reason this hard fought deal does not go through is Parliament, then in their view no deal will ever go through so what would be the point of yet another extension.

I fear the short term consequences of a No Deal Brexit, but only because of the lack of a transition period. Most elements of the withdrawal agreement will have to be negotiated in other ways in any case. Planes must fly, people must travel, food and medicines must move. These are not optional. It is the likely chaos of sorting things out quickly that is a concern.

Leaving with a deal and a transition period will I think see a decent bounce in the price of UK and European shares. Leaving with no deal will have effects I really can’t predict, but I would be pessimistic.

Whatever happens, Boris will look to be the man who tried hard, Parliament will look at best foolish and at worst in need of wholesale changes. I think that will mean an election will see return of a Tory government with a big majority. I hope it is one that is really as ‘one nation’ as Boris claims he is.

Note that this an attempt at an objective assessment, not my personal approval of what has happened! As an investor, one has to put one’s own politics to one side and for the most part live with the politics of the markets.

Filed Under: Economics, Markets

Small is beautiful?

17th October 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

You need to be logged in to view this content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Funds, Members Only, Portfolios

Monday Mash Up 005

14th October 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Today’s post is more of the ‘thought for the day’ variety than a news update. With the Brexit talks reaching a real climax and the US and China still talking trade, I can’t add much of any value on the prospects for markets. My weekend comment on deflating soufflés looks to have been appropriate.

What has come up in a couple of discussions with NotHarry readers recently is something I thought worth emphasising with a brief post.

If you invest in a multi asset portfolio, actively managed or just a fixed asset mix of passive index trackers, you will be getting a diversified range of assets with built in risk controls based on the most up to date investment thinking. That does not necessarily mean the fund will deliver what you want (the reasons for that are for a longer article) but no-one could say they are not designed in line with good practice.

Why oh why do people believe that advisers know what they are doing when it comes to investments – many have no idea.

So why would you want more than one fund adopting such an approach? I suppose advisers would say to diversify your risk further? But if the two or more multi asset funds have similar asset mixes, are aimed at the same risk profile (hopefully yours) and statistical examination reveals that over long periods their prices have consistently moved almost exactly in line, what has been achieved? Zilch.

One fund may be called 80/20 and another Active Market or similar names implying something about the asset mix, but that is not diversification! One may use passives and other invest (more expensively) in the multi fund managers’ in house sub funds. They may even have slightly different stated objectives.

Believing that is enough is a schoolboy error – just assuming that multi asset funds are different because they have different labels. If one of a selection of funds is more expensive and it delivers no diversification whatsoever, it is an utter waste of money!

After the major stock market decline of 2000-2002 I assisted a very upset pensioner take a complaint to the Ombudsman service. He had been put in pension drawdown, arguably with good reason and assured his investments were diversified. In fact, they comprised a UK managed fund (virtually all UK equities), a UK equity fund and an international equity fund (with a UK weighting in it). Of course they were all very closely correlated and he lost so much money his pension income almost halved. He won substantial compensation, fortunately.

Nearly 20 years on and people are still being misled by advisers who don’t really know what risk management means.

Filed Under: Asset Allocation, Portfolios

Deal or No Deal?

12th October 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

As Noel Edmunds might have said, before his whole life was taken up suing Lloyds Banking Group (quite rightly in my view).

Readers will have noticed big jumps in stock markets and Sterling when the news broke that a possible Brexit deal is back on the cards.

This many strike you as odd, in that markets have not sold off that much relative to where they were when Mrs May was trying to get a deal through and I read the news as saying Boris will present something very similar to what was on offer previously but if course as a triumph. As one wittier commentator put it, the threat of No Deal, ‘do or die’ gave the UK the extra clout to make the concessions required.

Is it time to pile into UK shares?

The markets are certainly right to think that for investors Brexit with a deal is a better option than leaving without. But what this jump shows is that any sort of good news is now seen as wonderful, not that really great prospects await the UK economy in the immediate future. We may simply spend a year heading towards another cliff edge – the end of the transition period.

However, if markets go up, we as investors are bound to be happy. Unless you are really confident in placing trades and are confident enough to buy Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), then the ‘forward pricing’ of OEICS means that you can’t really buy into such a rapid intra day price jump because the higher price will be what you buy at, after the jump has been priced in.

In fact as relief rallies are at risk of collapsing like an unlucky participant’s soufflé in a TV cooking contest, attempting to time the market on one day’s news is not recommended!

Filed Under: Economics, Markets, Trading

Monday Mash Up 004

7th October 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

If you read the ‘start the week’ data on the Bloomberg business news website today, you might conclude that nothing much was going on – everything is calm and nobody is worried about anything.

But if you happened to have looked at the same site yesterday, being a Sunday, you would have seen a more thoughtful set of bullet points. They highlighted the fact that Germany is going into recession, politicians in Europe think the UK is now just playing a blame game and does not want a Brexit deal, there are potential difficulties coming up with the US/China trade talks and that maybe the US economy has now joined the global slowdown.

The last possibility can hardly be a surprise, given that anyone who knows anything about economics from a GCSE student upwards would have predicted that as a likely outcome of US policy on global trade.

Some readers may have thought it odd that US stock markets seemed to react positively to weaker US employment growth, one of the data points underlying the suspicion that the US economy is now braking.

That is because the possibility of a slowdown should, in theory, lead to lower interest rates in the US and the basis of equity share valuations is, at a fundamental level, connected with interest rates, Broadly speaking, lower interest rate expectations are good for equities because they are good for bonds.

If you print too much money, you can’t juggle with it because it drowns you!

This however is a mechanical relationship, so may not always correctly predict the prospects for equities in the medium term. If there is too much inflation at the same time as a slowing or even shrinking economy, suggesting that horror or horrors – stagflation, then the prospects for shares are really rather poor. Furthermore, the use of monetary loosening to boost asset prices is rather taken for granted, It is questionable as to what outcomes might follow if interest rates can only go down further by becoming negative.

So we should not join in the markets excitement about lower interest rates and assume that, as I have suggested before, central banks, will always be able to bail out ill thought-out political policies, or fantasy financial constructions in the corporate banking sector.

One might think of quantative easing as a bit like paracetemol. It lowers the pain if used judiciously, but take too much and you will get some fairly horrible major organ damage.

Filed Under: Economics, Monthly commentary, Uncategorised

October 2019

1st October 2019 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Pottering About

Having just moved on from a career in building society branch management, I was actually training for another job in October 1987 when the stock market crashed, as well as there being a memorable hurricane.  That probably explains why I always feel nervous about stock market prospects at the beginning of October.   I was already interested in investment markets at that time and looking forward to getting more hands on with the markets.

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Economics, Education, Markets, Monthly commentary, Portfolios

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 48
  • Page 49
  • Page 50
  • Page 51
  • Page 52
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 66
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mid-month Musings – September 2026
  • Deep Dive – September 2026
  • Mid Month Musings with Mark (not me!)
  • Thank You
  • Deep Dive – August 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised