• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

Trading

Midweek musings – Rock flattens Hut

3rd November 2021 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

One of the reasons I don’t own shares directly (other then for exceptional reasons) is that most of the available shares in any given company are owned by gigantic institutions and if they decide to sell large blocks, the market will usually get wind of that and the share price will plummet. The more concentrated the ownership of shares in a business, the greater that risk becomes.

Yesterday there was a perfect example of that risk turning into reality. A business which has a chequered history is called THG or the Hut group. Its shares were quoted at around 800 pence at the start of the year after floating as a new listing at 500 pence. That was a classic case in itself – the market rating a retailer with not much special going for it as it it was a technology business. It has happened before (ASOS, in its early days).

When will they ever learn?

The mega investor BlackRock built up a 10% holding in the company or 124 million shares (data anyone could check out using stock market ownership notices). They have now decided they don’t want to keep all those shares and are selling half of them. To shift that many shares in one go is not easy, even for BlackRock, so they have offered them at a discount to a price that has alraedy plummeted – in fact at 195 pence.

So if you bought the shares at 800 pence on the basis of a Sunday paper tip written by some lazy pundit (people do that), you would be 75% down by now!

If you owned these shares in a fund, the most you could possibly own (and your fund manager would be due to be sacked if you did) would be 10% of the fund. so your maximum loss would be 7.5%.

In summary, if you want to speculate in shares, remember that you might well be a sprat swimming in the whales’ feeding grounds.

Filed Under: Education, Rants, Trading

Monday mashup – the hokey-cokey

23rd November 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

The title reference is to the ‘in, out, in, out shake it all about’ line in that dance. I am prompted to write about the evergreen conundrum of market timing, mainly as a refresher, for two reasons.

A perpetual question

Firstly, when I am completing the first stage of my training plans with subscribers, they inevitably become nervous when the time comes to actually make purchases from cash reserves. Secondly, the current climate is one where all 3 of the major uncertainties overhanging financial markets for so long are becoming less unpredictable (US elections, Brexit and Covid-19). One might say, one sorted, one soon to be sorted in a way we can predict and the last looking a bit less disastrous.

The second factor suggest it might be a good time to invest but unusually the pricing of large parts of the market suggest there are only 2 games in town: booming new tech growth stocks and dull low value businesses doing old fashioned things. This makes decisions on purchasing far from straightforward without some discipline and methodology.

Resources

I have written on this subject from various viewpoints before. Here are some reference points (several will be subscriber only):

How to time investment sales

Blog post -June 2018

How to pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian

A fable for investors

The last article is quite long and I enjoyed writing it, but it may be tricky to follow for some readers. It serves to show that decisions to take money out of markets and re-invest later can be rewarded handsomely but in most cases, the source of the extra profit is luck.

This article can be understood well enough if you skip past my ‘in’ jokes about the financial system in the back story and start reading from the ‘3 decisions’ paragraph.

Some basic common sense

There is good sense in buying obviously cheap markets after a crash and not piling all your free cash into a market that has been booming for years. But aside from those common sense observations, I would suggest the best approach is to think about the long term and have a simple risk minimisation strategy.

Some years ago the then famous fund manager Anthony Bolton (a contrarian manager by style) used to often say that ‘time IN the markets is better than TIMING the markets’. If you look at very long term graphs of stock markets you will see that he is absolutely correct. The line goes steadily up and unless you have a gigantic screen or very large piece of paper, the compression of short term movements means you will not be able to even see the large drop of say October 1987.

Some text book rubrics

Don’t focus on the wrong data – investment is long term

Two things need to always be born in mind:

Every investor, however skilled or experienced buys the right investment at the wrong price when judged over a week or a month, but that might look like a stunning piece of judgement over 5 years or 10 years. In fact, I personally often buy investments I expect to do well a little early and lose money until the market catches up with my analysis. I don’t mind an initial 15% loss if my investment is up 25% in a year’s time – I might have made a lot less if I had waited and the price had already gone up 20% from the low point.

So rule number one it to not get all bitter and regretful about a fall in price in the early weeks or months of a well thought through fund selection.

The second idea to always remember is that when you invest sensibly (ie in diversified and intelligently chosen blocks of shares), you are just jumping on the capitalist machine. It’s function is to make money for investors and over time IT ALWAYS DOES.

Some of us (me included) find the way in which that happens at times rather inconsistent with our personal ethics, but that is really rather irrelevant – the machine exists as a part of the world and without it, the world would not function – even the Chinese communists seem to accept that.

So even if the machine grinds to a halt due to a malfunction from time to time and some people lose faith in it, it gets fixed pretty quickly. One only loses money from a diversified portfolio of collective funds (irrespective of when you bought an investment), if one withdraws money at the wrong time.

So the thing to worry about is managing your cash flow, not when to invest.

If I could ever claim to have been a good IFA, I would like to think it is because I got people to think about objectives first and short term investment returns second. If you have 3 young kids and can only afford one family car, you don’t start your selection process with 0-60 times and top speeds.

We all keep learning

To improve returns, it may arguably make sense to phase investments of larger sums – I accept that. Refer to the various articles listed above for other angles, but don’t expect a neat ‘this is the trick’ answer – it does not exist!

But we can try different techniques and become a little more skilled. We will make mistakes on the way – the world can mess up the most rational decisions. In investment portfolio construction and purchase, the only perfect science is hindsight

Filed Under: Markets, Monthly commentary, Trading, Uncategorised

If you see an ant, look for the other ten thousand..(m)

29th July 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Anyone who has lived at a rural address, will know what I mean. Most of the time the stray ant or 3 that you spot on your kitchen worktop has come from a community some way from your house, but not always. It pays to check!

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Members Only, Trading

Monday mashup – parking your money

27th July 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Gloom for epidemiologists but booming stock markets

I know some people don’t pay too much attention to the global Covid-19 case numbers but I suspect everyone is aware that the total number of daily new cases continues to rise and the rate has been accelerating for some weeks. I suppose my readers will be aware of the ongoing lack of progress in holding back case numbers because of the news over the weekend about trips to Spain.

I am sorry to be negative, but the facts cannot be ignored

I start with this gloomy comment because it is the main context against which we have to judge stock market valuations which have recovered back to and even ahead of pre-Covid levels in some sectors.

Whilst there is some good news on vaccines and therapeutic medicine with Professor Holgate (and colleagues) in Southampton, whose work on hay-fever and allergies was gospel to me in the 1980s having been in the news with his later work on beta-interferon, such science will not bring results in the next few weeks, perhaps not even this year.

Now as the medical news, being very bad in the short term, is disconnected with the recent stock market trends, one can have a short term tactical approach. As I have said before, one can ‘make hay while the sun shines’ even if you can see the tornado in the distance.

But if you see a decent return, say 10% to 15% over a few weeks or months on a well chosen fund and you decide to take the gain, where do you put the money? This is the question that I have been thinking about recently.

Where to park gains?

One has various choices of defensive assets: cash (no return worth talking about), fixed income (incredibly expensive at the moment and credit risk rising), absolute return and macro or market neutral funds (most of which appear not to have worked in the recent past) and gold (already up in value with a good tailwind of investor support). That is a good short list but there is no stand out ‘best’ option.

What is a cautious investment these days?

I have been happy to invest in physical gold for some months for multiple reasons that I have explained in other posts (call or mail me if you are a subscriber and want clarification).

Although the majority of defensive funds, like absolute return, macro strategy and simple cautious multi asset, don’t offer that much protection in a systemic crash, some managers do seem to have developed the right timing skills.

I have invested in the JP Morgan Global Macro Opportunities fund for some years and it has done what it promised, although a little erratically.

I recently identified during research with a subscriber the BlackRock European Absolute Alpha fund. This seems to have benefited from some great timing decisions in the fixed income market by the managers at the start of the year.

These are examples of funds that would have protected you well in March this year, but that is not of course any guarantee that they will work next time! If you use them as examples, you can no doubt find alternatives that might meet your needs.

Investors need to form their own view of what suits their needs best when reserving money from gains. Some may spend it! Others may just hold funds on deposit and accept the trivial rates of interest. For those who like to get a return whatever and can afford some risk, gold and the best defensive funds are worth considering. Actually, I will be doing all of the above!

Filed Under: Education, Funds, Trading

Monday mashup – PS

15th June 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Since I posted this morning, I have read 2 news items that ought to be brought to your attention! My primary source is the New York Times excellent Dealbook daily briefing.

$50 million each way on the Dow?

One is that in their attempts to explain the illogical level of current stock market valuations, some professional traders point to the increase in private traders using the stock market as an entertainment medium in the absence of sporting events to bet on. Add that to the increase in day traders partly driven by on-line stock punting services (some of which must get close to what is legal in term of pumping shares) and it is a credible suggestion of at least a contributing factor.

Something like that happened before the Wall Street Crash, as I recall……

The bigger they are, the harder they fall

The second point is a bit technical but important. It has been noted that the huge Japanese investment/holding company Softbank, which operates more like an investment trust, with its Vision fund as a major activity, has been noted to be buying up bond issues from companies of which it has significant equity stakes.

Now this can be seen in a number of ways but the most negative interpretation might be that it is bailing out cash flow issues to prevent its investment targets going under. With Softbank, which made a fortune by investing early in Alibaba, nothing is a small deal. I wonder if this is another hairline crack in the dam (its disputed deal with WeWork being a slightly worrying to?). Google the name if you want to know more – it makes interesting reading for investors!

This matters not only to Japanese stock market investors because Softbank is a major shareholder in numerous global businesses. If Softbank goes pop, global stock markets would feel the chill.

Filed Under: Monthly commentary, Trading

Monday Mashup – ps

6th April 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

One of NotHarry’s readers responded to my comments this morning by asking how one might actually get some objective data on the progress of the fight back against Covid-19. Flippantly, I replied Dr Google.

Googling something like “Coronavirus treatment research” and skipping any advert style listing and the quack medicine entries (so getting to the second or third screen usually) really does work. I can see articles for The Lancet, New York Times, CNN and various science publications even on the first page. Clearly at this time, the most recent articles will likely be the most useful.

Varying the search term to read “scientific articles etc” will get a better list but you won’t be able to read more than a summary or abstract from some of the professional publisher sites.

NotHarry is a true bookworm, both traditional and electronic…

Another useful way to see what is happing is to look at graphics that show the pace of virus spread. I like the tool offered at this web address (URL) https://aatishb.com/covidtrends/. You can easily edit the list of countries whose data is shown. If you did that today and included Austria, you would immediately see why they are able to slightly relax their lockdown. You will also see why there is a lot of pain still to come, if you add the lines for the US and the UK.

Markets today have jumped at the news from Austria and less dramatic improvements in Spain and Italy, but that may be premature, in my judgement.

If you think I am too pessimistic (and I may be, of course), I suggest you might be prudent to make some modest phased allocations of cash to the markets most sold off and those best insulated from the damage already done. To me that suggests a look at the technology and innovations funds and funds investing away from the mega caps (like the FTSE 100). A passive index tracking fund with low costs might well be a simple way to dip your toe back in the water!

Filed Under: Markets, Trading

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mid-month Musings – September 2026
  • Deep Dive – September 2026
  • Mid Month Musings with Mark (not me!)
  • Thank You
  • Deep Dive – August 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised