• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

Members Only

Watching Brief – July 2023

3rd July 2023 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Pottering About

Half time scores

I find it useful to have a look at market returns around the globe halfway through the year and so present below some approximate data (Source: Yahoo Finance).

INDEX Year to Date Change (local currency)
FTSE 100 No change
FTSE250 (-5%)
S&P500 +1%
Bitcoin +73%
Nikkei225 +28%
Hang Seng (-10%)
DAX/CAC (averaged) +13%
Gold futures +10%
£/USD +5%
£/JPY +16%
A Bitcoin bounce!

Of course, all data taken over a short discrete time period must be viewed with caution, especially noting the significance to percentage returns of where the starting point happened to be – Bitcoin was not exactly flourishing in late 2022, just to pick one example.

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Economics, Markets, Members Only, Monthly commentary, Politics, Research tools

Midweek Musings – pessimism prevails for the moment

28th June 2023 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

You need to be logged in to view this content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Academic theory, Economics, Markets, Members Only, Monthly commentary, Passives and Trackers, Rants

Midweek Musings – the next tech revolution?

21st June 2023 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

I recently viewed a webcast which took the form of a panel question and answer session with a professor and post doctorate researchers from MIT in the USA, addressing the implications of generative AI (GIA), the correct technical phrase for ChatGPT and all the other “intelligent” on line offerings that may follow it.

This is the current hot topic in technology news, so is bound to interest investors who believe we increasingly live in a digital economy.

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Economics, Members Only, Monthly commentary, Portfolios

Midweek Musings – will they, won’t they?

14th June 2023 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

You may guess I am referring to the US Federal Reserve’s imminent decision on US interest rates. The markets are expecting a pause in rate rises, but not the beginning of reductions. What the Fed decides will always impinge on the options open to the UK’s rate setters, because UK rates must line up with US rates if Sterling is not to depreciate: Sterling depreciation is inflationary in the UK.

UK currency pointers (rising Pound) and Gilts pricing (jump up to higher yields) suggest that markets expect the Bank of England to adjust upwards this month, thereby being more hawkish than the Fed

As we will shortly know what the decisions are, I am not going to pontificate on what we can glean about market trajectory yet. I do however still see more of a positive attitude in investor behaviour at the moment.

Scores on the doors?

To fill in for this week, I supply below anwers to some of the questions in my June 1st test! I will slowly work through all the questions. Some require longer answers than others.

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Academic theory, Basics, Members Only, Monthly commentary

Watching Brief – June 2023

1st June 2023 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Pottering About

No result yet in the market tug of war

The market moves up and down at the moment as it reacts to conflicting data

As I started to write this month, at least one potential crisis had passed with an outcome that markets will find acceptable.  The US politicians have reached an agreement (subject to Congressional approval) on funding the US public debt for a full 2 years more.

Bad news is the fact that the war in Ukraine is building up to a critical point and we cannot know what the consequences will be.  Plus, a welter of news from China suggests that it has economic problems on a scale not anticipated and which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) may have trouble managing.

The push me/pull you trading in markets that we have seen this year is further sustained by the news that recessions might be avoided in some developed markets (good) but that means interest rates will stay higher for longer (bad).

For once there is some genuinely good news about a major business, which will be owned by many funds popular with readers, doing exceptionally.  This is Nvidia, the tech company set to benefit hugely from the rush to invest in AI.  It is looking like another Tesla for the moment, which means it will likely end in tears, but we can hope our fund managers will ride the bandwagon and book some profits.

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Academic theory, Asset Allocation, Education, Funds, Members Only, Monthly commentary, Portfolios, Sustainability/ESG, Trading

Midweek Musings – the 2 most common investor errors

24th May 2023 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Diversification – remember what that means.

All investors make mistakes, even those as famous as Warren Buffet or Terry Smith.

Purchasing investments is about applying general, sound principles that are rooted in the very essence of capitalism and diligent application of those principles and some common sense will always result in acceptable returns over the long run.

However, even though a diversified portfolio of quality funds will always make money long term (if it didn’t, capitalism would have failed too), we can all have components in our portfolios that we worry about, because they are not making money at the moment.

Furthermore, when we pick funds or shares, we are making a judgement based on logic and the data we have available. The facts can and do change or we may even have had incomplete data, or misunderstood its meaning, so we will (all of us) buy investments that are unsuitable when reviewed with that wonderful all-knowing review tool called hindsight.

I used to estimate that I would regret recommending one or two out of every ten funds I put in front of clients. Over the years, the error rate improved, but I still make mistakes now (eg backing fintech at the wrong point in the cycle).

Never forget that if a portfolio did not have any funds performing in a different way to the general market trend, by definition, it would not be diversified.

It would be unsusual, for example, for the large cap global growth funds in your portfolio to be doing well and at the same time to be raking it in on your defensive value funds. If the markets like Tesla and Netflix, they almost certainly don’t want to buy Nestle or Unilever (and vice versa). You might think that you can tactically switch between funds to be always in line with the relevant market factors and if you can do that well, I recommend that you start up your own investment blog!

Anyone out there want to let me fully retire to my slippers and hi-fi?

In reality, and I say this based on over 30 years of reviewing portfolios with investors, human nature means that nearly everyone, on scanning a list of owned funds with recent past performance numbers, will focus on the funds that are showing losses, generally without any reference to their portfolio weighting, when they were bought or what the difference is between performance over varying time periods.

Thinking about this calmly and objectively, we might be tempted into saying – ‘Oh, that’s not me – I take the long view and once I have understood why a fund is underperforming for now, I am chilled about it’.

I am sorry to say that my experience is that even if investors (and I include most IFAS in this analysis) would like to see themselves that way, almost everyone actually stresses out about the funds they own with red or negative numbers showing in their reports.

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Funds, Members Only, Monthly commentary, Portfolios, Research tools

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 38
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mid-month Musings – September 2026
  • Deep Dive – September 2026
  • Mid Month Musings with Mark (not me!)
  • Thank You
  • Deep Dive – August 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised