• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

Uncategorised

‘This is insanity!’

8th December 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

I quote from a US venture capital specialist whose words I read this morning, commenting on the stampede of investment funds into new businesses, the vast majority of which are not making profits and in some cases not even making products!

His main reason for making the exclamation is that new ventures are able to secure new capital funding, on notionally higher equity valuations, as often as every 6 months. That used to be something that happened every 2 or 3 years. It is said that there is so much money available to invest that investors are actually queueing up.

That can hardly encourage the target companies to use the cash prudently – there are now anecdotes of fantasy order books and family members getting huge salaries to do nothing obviously useful.

A more sober fact came my way last week. Premier Miton presented data giving the CAPE (cyclically adjusted price earnings ratio) ranges for global markets as measured by the MCSI World index for various past time periods.

Naturally this ratio is highest when markets are expensive and has been highest of all ahead of major market setbacks, like in 1999/2000. The current data point is right at the extreme of the range, just where it usually is ahead of a sudden return to reality.

Some warning flags ought not to be ignored

Of course, no-one can say when a crash will happen and it usually happens so fast that one knows about it too late to protect ones profits.

As I have written consistently, timing markets is very difficult and the battle with human psychological biases is tricky. Crashes are always reversed over time anyway. So staying in the market is logical and in the long run gets rewarded.

However, I do think it might be wise to note the frequency of warnings from objective commentators that the runaway train might be about to come off the rails.

I am taking profits from my best performing holdings constantly now and only buying anything new that is great value, has not made much money for ages and comprises companies with cash flows generated by actually delivering goods and services at a steady profit.

And I am still retaining plenty of cash – I would much rather miss out on some of the ‘opportunities’ that are soaking up the tsunami of cash let loose by central banks.

As a lesson, I have excellent memories of people buying over-priced spec built houses in the early 1980s with 100% mortgages – the mass of repossessions that followed the collapse of the boom cycle was such that individuals who had cash on hand were able to buy multiple properties at knock down auction prices (at times 60% below the original purchase price) and they then set up property rental portfolios that made them millionaires in a decade or so.

As someone famous (probably Mr Buffett) said, the foremost mantra of investing successfully is ‘buy low, sell high’. I am attempting a bit of both. I still have a core portfolio in the markets, of course, but as I have said before, tinkering at the edges can be profitable. That means being active, taking profits often and if those profits are to be re-invested, buying with utmost care.

Filed Under: Uncategorised

Watching Brief – December 2020

1st December 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

You need to be logged in to view this content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Monthly commentary, Uncategorised

Monday mashup – the hokey-cokey

23rd November 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

The title reference is to the ‘in, out, in, out shake it all about’ line in that dance. I am prompted to write about the evergreen conundrum of market timing, mainly as a refresher, for two reasons.

A perpetual question

Firstly, when I am completing the first stage of my training plans with subscribers, they inevitably become nervous when the time comes to actually make purchases from cash reserves. Secondly, the current climate is one where all 3 of the major uncertainties overhanging financial markets for so long are becoming less unpredictable (US elections, Brexit and Covid-19). One might say, one sorted, one soon to be sorted in a way we can predict and the last looking a bit less disastrous.

The second factor suggest it might be a good time to invest but unusually the pricing of large parts of the market suggest there are only 2 games in town: booming new tech growth stocks and dull low value businesses doing old fashioned things. This makes decisions on purchasing far from straightforward without some discipline and methodology.

Resources

I have written on this subject from various viewpoints before. Here are some reference points (several will be subscriber only):

How to time investment sales

Blog post -June 2018

How to pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian

A fable for investors

The last article is quite long and I enjoyed writing it, but it may be tricky to follow for some readers. It serves to show that decisions to take money out of markets and re-invest later can be rewarded handsomely but in most cases, the source of the extra profit is luck.

This article can be understood well enough if you skip past my ‘in’ jokes about the financial system in the back story and start reading from the ‘3 decisions’ paragraph.

Some basic common sense

There is good sense in buying obviously cheap markets after a crash and not piling all your free cash into a market that has been booming for years. But aside from those common sense observations, I would suggest the best approach is to think about the long term and have a simple risk minimisation strategy.

Some years ago the then famous fund manager Anthony Bolton (a contrarian manager by style) used to often say that ‘time IN the markets is better than TIMING the markets’. If you look at very long term graphs of stock markets you will see that he is absolutely correct. The line goes steadily up and unless you have a gigantic screen or very large piece of paper, the compression of short term movements means you will not be able to even see the large drop of say October 1987.

Some text book rubrics

Don’t focus on the wrong data – investment is long term

Two things need to always be born in mind:

Every investor, however skilled or experienced buys the right investment at the wrong price when judged over a week or a month, but that might look like a stunning piece of judgement over 5 years or 10 years. In fact, I personally often buy investments I expect to do well a little early and lose money until the market catches up with my analysis. I don’t mind an initial 15% loss if my investment is up 25% in a year’s time – I might have made a lot less if I had waited and the price had already gone up 20% from the low point.

So rule number one it to not get all bitter and regretful about a fall in price in the early weeks or months of a well thought through fund selection.

The second idea to always remember is that when you invest sensibly (ie in diversified and intelligently chosen blocks of shares), you are just jumping on the capitalist machine. It’s function is to make money for investors and over time IT ALWAYS DOES.

Some of us (me included) find the way in which that happens at times rather inconsistent with our personal ethics, but that is really rather irrelevant – the machine exists as a part of the world and without it, the world would not function – even the Chinese communists seem to accept that.

So even if the machine grinds to a halt due to a malfunction from time to time and some people lose faith in it, it gets fixed pretty quickly. One only loses money from a diversified portfolio of collective funds (irrespective of when you bought an investment), if one withdraws money at the wrong time.

So the thing to worry about is managing your cash flow, not when to invest.

If I could ever claim to have been a good IFA, I would like to think it is because I got people to think about objectives first and short term investment returns second. If you have 3 young kids and can only afford one family car, you don’t start your selection process with 0-60 times and top speeds.

We all keep learning

To improve returns, it may arguably make sense to phase investments of larger sums – I accept that. Refer to the various articles listed above for other angles, but don’t expect a neat ‘this is the trick’ answer – it does not exist!

But we can try different techniques and become a little more skilled. We will make mistakes on the way – the world can mess up the most rational decisions. In investment portfolio construction and purchase, the only perfect science is hindsight

Filed Under: Markets, Monthly commentary, Trading, Uncategorised

Monday mashup – result?

9th November 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

My reading of on-line news media is that Joe Biden is now President of the USA. Except he isn’t. Not yet anyway.

Stock markets will certainly take the high probability that he will be inaugurated President in January by running a relief rally, probably everywhere in the world. If there are serious shenanigans from the Trump camp, that could reverse quickly.

Having had the very unpleasant experience of battling someone with a severe narcissistic personality disorder in my business life, I can only report that once defeated by an irrefutable act (not evidence, because such people can’t understand any truth apart from one that makes them look good), narcissists move on to something else and just blank the past like an Etch-a Sketch screen.

So I am happy to trust that the media and markets will not find their expectations crushed.

In any case, the Covid-19 pandemic is in my view a more serious threat to investment markets and for investments in the UK and Europe, the actual impact of Brexit on trade systems.

Tactical investors will continue to back investments that are more ‘Covid and Brexit proof’, even if they are already expensive. Global Growth funds with tech, pharma, financial services and on-line consumption biases will likely be the places to make money in the near term. Some over-valued shares will collapse because of changes in consumption patterns and maybe we will see inflation poke its nose out from the cellar where it has been hibernating.

The latter would be bad news for fixed income investments and good news for the gold price. As ever, whatever your view of the future, you can find something with promise and diversify your risk with something defensive or contrarian.

Filed Under: Monthly commentary, Uncategorised

Monday mashup – pause pressed

2nd November 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

This week I will finalise my monthly subscriber only commentary – I will publish it after we have a better idea of the outcome of the US elections (I hope that will be this week!). So no Monday Mashup today because my latest thoughts will be in the Watching Brief text.

As a teaser, in addition to the prospects for Trumpty Dumpty (as named by John Lithgow), I will be expounding on the permanence of consumer spending in today’s world and the chances of a double dip recession with a look at markets from 1999-2002 as a history lesson. I will try and break through the fog on factor investing and continue showing you my nitty gritty research into funds offering future opportunities in the UK stock market.

Filed Under: Announcements, Uncategorised

Researching UK funds – an example

21st October 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

I recently published a new permanent page on the site about the process of being contrarian in selecting funds and used an example of researching UK funds (which I think are cheap at the moment) to explain the process.

I have continued that research process and one curiosity popped up that I thought might be educational.

If you list UK funds in your preferred research tool, you will find the Blackrock UK Equity fund showing a year to date return of around 3% which is pretty good relative to the average large cap fund or even the benchmark index, say the FT All Share. This is a 5 star fund in Morningstar’s ratings.

It so happens that listed right next to it in the ranking order I selected was the Royal London UK Equity Class M fund which year to date has lost about 19%. Note that this is different to the Royal London UK Growth fund which did a little better and is classified as a mid-cap blend fund.

Now that is a whopping 22% gap from Blackrock. How come?

You have to put in time doing your research if you want to find real bargains in the funds market

This is a blog post, so I will keep the answers short, but I am happy to discuss the research in more detail with subscribers.

  • It is not that Royal London are just useless – the team they acquired when they merged with the Co-op has a good reputation and has delivered excellent results with other funds, notably sustainability focused ones.
  • The fund manager at Royal London is relatively new (started 2016) – that might be a factor? The smaller companies fund which he runs is a poor performer.
  • The performance of the 2 funds was similar until 2020, so something very different happened recently. In fact the Royal London fund has a Morningstar 4 star rating.
  • A really big clue comes from the Morningstar 9 box equity style grid. The BlackRock fund is large cap growth and the Royal London one large cap value on Morningstar’s overall assessment.
  • The top 10 holdings have considerable overlap, so the variation must be further down the holdings list, which we can’t immediately see.
  • Although these are UK funds, the BlackRock fund has 25% of its stocks listed in the US, Royal London only 5%. An overseas listing is acceptable for a UK fund if the firm’s main business activity is in UK, or it is in truth UK based. Both funds own Experian plc, which is US listed, for example.
  • Blackrock’s fund has a significant weight to technology and sensitive stocks, Royal London does not.

More research (like looking at half yearly reports) may reveal some more about the strategy of each manager, but on recent evidence, BlackRock made the right calls for a limited recovery in the UK stock market, biasing the fund away from some parts of the market. Royal London would look to be a good contrarian pick for the brave, although there may be better alternatives. I have not completed my work on this subject yet!

If you are going to invest against the trend (the momentum factor), you need to be thorough with your research and to supress your psychological biases. I will try to keep posting examples to help out!

Filed Under: Education, Funds, Uncategorised

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 19
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mid-month Musings – September 2026
  • Deep Dive – September 2026
  • Mid Month Musings with Mark (not me!)
  • Thank You
  • Deep Dive – August 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised