• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

Nikol-ess?

16th November 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

The strange title of this post is a cross reference to my post/rant entitled ‘Emporer’s New Clothes’ in June 2020.

This is about Nikola, the start up electic vehicle business into which GM invested a calculated 2 BILLION dollars, according to media reports.

By September 10th a major documented report (67 pages of it) was published by a researcher and market shorter called Hindenburg – look at hindenburgresearch.com – claiming Nikola’s founder Tevor Milton and associates were lying in their teeth. The founder had already built a track record of dubious dealing and misrepresentation and his brother, the named director of hydrogen technology, is reported to be well qualified in pouring concrete and maybe projecting fantasies but not as a hydrogen fuel scientist.

The up and running hydrogen powered trucks for which so many orders were claimed to have been placed (the same orders more than once) were of course fakes. This much had already been suggested by Bloomberg. Nikola’s first effort (in 2016) at a hydrogen truck was actually powered by gas, but CNG, not hydrogen. Natural gas powered buses are of course already in widespread use.

In the chaos that resulted GM appointed a new chairman (the guy who did the investment deal). They are still involved, but with probably not much money or even time really spent and they may have acquired a potential research facility. They probably got good publicity from the coverage of the ‘investment’ and there has not been much general publicity about the Hindeburg report and its consequences.

The quoted 2 billion investment was based on the supposed valuation of the Nikola business, not an actual amount of money spent.

The fuller story presented by Hindenburg is an entertaining story by itself if you are interested in the not uncommon blatant corporate deceit that pops up in the US in particular but also in the UK; those of you with Hampshire connections may recall a major IT con being perpetrated on the Wessex Regional Health Authority by a newly formed business.

The nugget of human behaviour that I collected from this tale was the willingness of people who should know better to take as fact presentations that are quite plainly suspicious or even obvious lies. They do this because they are ‘primed’ to do so and to act sceptical would risk opprobrium from their fellow humans.

Much as the Andersen tale warns. Good sense has always been around if you looked for it. Companies that never make profits and maybe not even any products are NOT worth a cent in reality. But plenty of money may get made trading their shares on fantasy valuations before the small child (or market shorting specialist) blurts out the truth.

Filed Under: Rants

Reader Interactions

Click here to cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mid-month Musings – September 2026
  • Deep Dive – September 2026
  • Mid Month Musings with Mark (not me!)
  • Thank You
  • Deep Dive – August 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised