Monthly commentary
Monday mashup – the hokey-cokey
The title reference is to the ‘in, out, in, out shake it all about’ line in that dance. I am prompted to write about the evergreen conundrum of market timing, mainly as a refresher, for two reasons.
A perpetual question
Firstly, when I am completing the first stage of my training plans with subscribers, they inevitably become nervous when the time comes to actually make purchases from cash reserves. Secondly, the current climate is one where all 3 of the major uncertainties overhanging financial markets for so long are becoming less unpredictable (US elections, Brexit and Covid-19). One might say, one sorted, one soon to be sorted in a way we can predict and the last looking a bit less disastrous.
The second factor suggest it might be a good time to invest but unusually the pricing of large parts of the market suggest there are only 2 games in town: booming new tech growth stocks and dull low value businesses doing old fashioned things. This makes decisions on purchasing far from straightforward without some discipline and methodology.
Resources
I have written on this subject from various viewpoints before. Here are some reference points (several will be subscriber only):
How to pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian
The last article is quite long and I enjoyed writing it, but it may be tricky to follow for some readers. It serves to show that decisions to take money out of markets and re-invest later can be rewarded handsomely but in most cases, the source of the extra profit is luck.
This article can be understood well enough if you skip past my ‘in’ jokes about the financial system in the back story and start reading from the ‘3 decisions’ paragraph.
Some basic common sense
There is good sense in buying obviously cheap markets after a crash and not piling all your free cash into a market that has been booming for years. But aside from those common sense observations, I would suggest the best approach is to think about the long term and have a simple risk minimisation strategy.
Some years ago the then famous fund manager Anthony Bolton (a contrarian manager by style) used to often say that ‘time IN the markets is better than TIMING the markets’. If you look at very long term graphs of stock markets you will see that he is absolutely correct. The line goes steadily up and unless you have a gigantic screen or very large piece of paper, the compression of short term movements means you will not be able to even see the large drop of say October 1987.

Don’t focus on the wrong data – investment is long term
Two things need to always be born in mind:
Every investor, however skilled or experienced buys the right investment at the wrong price when judged over a week or a month, but that might look like a stunning piece of judgement over 5 years or 10 years. In fact, I personally often buy investments I expect to do well a little early and lose money until the market catches up with my analysis. I don’t mind an initial 15% loss if my investment is up 25% in a year’s time – I might have made a lot less if I had waited and the price had already gone up 20% from the low point.
So rule number one it to not get all bitter and regretful about a fall in price in the early weeks or months of a well thought through fund selection.
The second idea to always remember is that when you invest sensibly (ie in diversified and intelligently chosen blocks of shares), you are just jumping on the capitalist machine. It’s function is to make money for investors and over time IT ALWAYS DOES.
Some of us (me included) find the way in which that happens at times rather inconsistent with our personal ethics, but that is really rather irrelevant – the machine exists as a part of the world and without it, the world would not function – even the Chinese communists seem to accept that.
So even if the machine grinds to a halt due to a malfunction from time to time and some people lose faith in it, it gets fixed pretty quickly. One only loses money from a diversified portfolio of collective funds (irrespective of when you bought an investment), if one withdraws money at the wrong time.
So the thing to worry about is managing your cash flow, not when to invest.
If I could ever claim to have been a good IFA, I would like to think it is because I got people to think about objectives first and short term investment returns second. If you have 3 young kids and can only afford one family car, you don’t start your selection process with 0-60 times and top speeds.
We all keep learning
To improve returns, it may arguably make sense to phase investments of larger sums – I accept that. Refer to the various articles listed above for other angles, but don’t expect a neat ‘this is the trick’ answer – it does not exist!
But we can try different techniques and become a little more skilled. We will make mistakes on the way – the world can mess up the most rational decisions. In investment portfolio construction and purchase, the only perfect science is hindsight
Monday mashup – let’s go to the gym
The headline is not referring to those strange smelling places where people go to listen to music whilst undergoing a physical regime to better their body and mind. Most of my subscribers are past the age where that would be a tempting way of whiling away their retirement and the younger readers will be locked out anyway, at least for now.
I am suggesting some mental stretches and heavy lifting by the ‘little grey cells’.
The huge banking and asset management business J P Morgan publishes an excellent quarterly information resource and commentary called Guide to the Markets. Anyone can view the main content and J P Morgan even supply helpful viewing tools. Just search for J P Morgan Guide to the Markets using your favoured search engine (Ecosia is worth a try if you are fed up with Google monopolising the world and like the idea your searches funding tree planting to help the NHS).

There is a vast amount of material available if you want a really testing workout but if your brain has almost hibernated because of lockdowns, scroll down and look at Investment Outlook (under More Insights – in the middle). After an introduction, this has a section called Key Themes.
One article that will be of interest to investors who prefer multi asset funds is the one headed ’60:40 When bond yields are near zero’. Like much of the site content, the commentary is backed by data charts and introduces ideas without getting too complex.
There are many ways of viewing data and commentary – just like a great health club, this place has huge variety of ways of getting your workout.
The forward looking analysis that features in different ways in the data packs and articles was picked up and summarised by media outlets that I saw as suggesting that it was time to look to ‘value’ investing because the growth and momentum factors were going to run out of steam. Assiduous readers of my rambling will know that I have come around to that point of view over the last few months.
My main take from the data is that the ‘on-off’ recession we are seeing now is not like any other and deeper and faster than any in the records but that the trend in US equity valuations is more or less uninterrupted. That suggests a tension that needs to be resolved. If you keep driving your sports car hard with an oil leak and ignore the engine warning light, you will not slow down for a while but the end result will be a catastrophic engine failure.
I like one banner that I spotted on the J P Morgan site: ‘Embrace volatility. Don’t panic. Stay diversified’. Spot on! Even markets that crash offer investors opportunities, if they are prepared.
Personal contact level subscribers who would be interested in exercising their minds by working through some of the resources on offer from J P Morgan can book a ‘personal trainer’ session with me for 45 minutes or so.
Monday mashup – result?
My reading of on-line news media is that Joe Biden is now President of the USA. Except he isn’t. Not yet anyway.
Stock markets will certainly take the high probability that he will be inaugurated President in January by running a relief rally, probably everywhere in the world. If there are serious shenanigans from the Trump camp, that could reverse quickly.
Having had the very unpleasant experience of battling someone with a severe narcissistic personality disorder in my business life, I can only report that once defeated by an irrefutable act (not evidence, because such people can’t understand any truth apart from one that makes them look good), narcissists move on to something else and just blank the past like an Etch-a Sketch screen.
So I am happy to trust that the media and markets will not find their expectations crushed.
In any case, the Covid-19 pandemic is in my view a more serious threat to investment markets and for investments in the UK and Europe, the actual impact of Brexit on trade systems.
Tactical investors will continue to back investments that are more ‘Covid and Brexit proof’, even if they are already expensive. Global Growth funds with tech, pharma, financial services and on-line consumption biases will likely be the places to make money in the near term. Some over-valued shares will collapse because of changes in consumption patterns and maybe we will see inflation poke its nose out from the cellar where it has been hibernating.
The latter would be bad news for fixed income investments and good news for the gold price. As ever, whatever your view of the future, you can find something with promise and diversify your risk with something defensive or contrarian.
Watching Brief – November 2020
Monday mashup – what are CBDCs?
As I got not a single question from subscribers, I will consider the Q&A idea to be a non-runner!
I will turn the tables.
My question: who knows what the above initials stand for?
I suspect no-one, yet the introduction of CBDCs has the potential to undermine the operations of every private sector bank in the world and change the whole balance of power in both democratic and autocratic countries.
I think it is possible that the wholesale introduction of CBDCs could be the best opportunity in around 150 years for governments to wrest back the power they have steadily lost to corporations since the late 19th century.

The acronym stands for Central Bank Digitised Currency.
Digital currencies are an interesting and current topic, but like most new ‘products’ have all sorts of hidden risks at the early development stage. Maybe that is why the UK Regulator the FCA is banning the sale and promotion of digital currency derivatives (the most risky way of ‘playing’ with an investment or commodity) to retail investors from next year.
Serious Bitcoin fans who want to take out hedges and so on will get around this by dealing on overseas exchanges, I guess.
And you may know that Facebook thought having a digital currency – Libra – was a good idea and that the G7 nations were seriously opposed to that, rather supporting my proposition that controlling currency will be the new battleground between states and mega corporations.
The news is that China is encouraging Hong Kong residents to get their hands on a chunk of Chinese government digital money by giving away lottery tickets and Shenzhen residents are already able to open digital Renminbi accounts with e-wallets. China is where about a quarter of all the people in the world live, so what happens there is significant.
Would you want to put your money with a government bank?
Any of you that have National Savings Certificates or Premium Bonds have already taken that decision and many did so because they thought it was the most secure option.
That makes me think that a government sponsored e-wallet account would quickly take market share from commercial banks.
The institution that has all your money and also controls the legislative process may be one to worry about. What do you think?