• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About This Website
    • A polite reminder
  • How To
    • Use this website and benefit from the subscription option
    • Pick a financial adviser
    • Ensure your investment adviser is delivering good value
    • Get expert help with running your own portfolio
    • Pick a ‘tax wrapper’
    • Pick a Trading Platform
    • Diversify a portfolio in today’s world
    • Invest in line with your conscience
    • Research (screen for) a specific fund requirement (m)
    • Pick a fund for the future or how to be a contrarian (m)
    • Find the ‘next best thing’ and make rational sell decisions (fund switching) (m)
    • Time investment sales (skim profits) (m)
    • Interpret a Morningstar X-Ray (m)
    • Use Trustnet for Research (m)
    • How to review a neglected portfolio when the world has moved on (m)
  • *Important Information*
  • Real World
    • A Frank Introduction to Investing
    • Costs
    • Investment Risk – Your Starter For 10
    • How are advisers fees worked out?
    • 10+ top tips for investors
    • An actual portfolio review (m)
    • Benchmarks – a thorny subject
    • Disinvestment from fossil fuel businesses – are there better options?
  • Tales of the Unexpected
    • Lola
    • Round and Round the Mulberry Bush
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and the lazy mind.
    • Property Development Schemes
  • For More Experienced Investors
  • Glossary with a Difference
  • Member Only Content (M)
    • Example of simple cash flow planner (m)
    • Long Reads
      • What is market shorting and is it a bad thing?
      • How to conduct a periodic portfolio review (m)
      • Investing without management (passively) – a better way? (m)
  • Portfolios and Funds (m)
    • Lessons in Portfolio Construction and Maintenance – Introduction
      • High Level Asset Allocation
      • Selecting Funds
      • Cash Flow and Tax Issues in Portfolio Construction
      • Setting Objectives and Understanding Risks
      • A suggested portfolio for Alex Bright
  • Multi Asset Academy (m)
    • Some basic basics
    • Who are Vanguard?
    • Are multi-asset funds expensive?
    • Cheap and cheerful?
    • Its all about asset allocation, but…
    • Myth and misunderstandings
    • Taking money out of multi asset funds – the pros and cons
    • Distribution funds – the forerunner of multi asset investing?
    • DIY Multi Asset – adding risk controls
    • Benchmark Fog
  • Member Login
  • Logout

Its Not Harry

Comment and opinion for retail investors in the UK

Monthly commentary

Monday mashup -1999 and all that

17th August 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

I am interested in psychology because I am interested in human behaviour, not just as it impacts on investments, but with all its joys and horrors.

There is a clear overlap between neurology and psychology and I have read that neurologists can agree with the idea that over time, our brains get programmed with biases, or ways of making decisions that are based on sub-conscious training of the process by past experience and maybe even inherited ‘coding’ of parts of our brains.

Now, I can vaguely remember that…

This is very relevant for investors who cannot avoid looking at the past when deciding how to position their investments for the future. If the past (insofar as we are aware of it) does not include any similar patterns to a developing situation, when that situation finally develops, we will be caught out – what has been called a ‘black swan’ event.

I think that where we are now with stock markets is actually a very white swan event. I have seen those birds ever since I was a little boy!

If one refers to the financial pages of newspapers and even web sites (which look oddly archaic) from 1999 – now a simple task thanks to Google, they read like they were written yesterday. What followed?

In March 1999, the NASDAQ peaked, then a whole series of events which were spread out over a whole year undermined the false and in some cases crooked (Worldcom and Enron, you may recall) valuations of many businesses. In the end, the NASAQ fell by around 75% – yes 75%! Other markets fell from the knock on effects and investors had to wait some 2 to 3 years to start making money again.

I read that in the second quarter of 2020 there were large net inflows into UK operated mutual funds (OEICs), with the exception of funds actually invested in the UK, which had outflows. Bond funds, index trackers and SRI funds all had positive flows of investor money. This was described in the article I read as ‘bargain hunting’.

If you want to see how history repeats itself, Google an article published by money.cnn.com called ‘Investing: 2000 and beyond’ and compare it with what pundits are saying now. Then check out what happened next to markets. You will find other articles if you have the time, referring to bargain hunters and new paradigms.

You will perhaps smile at the concluding advice in the CNN piece that US investors ought to reduce their market exposure to only 80% US and risk a whopping 20% elsewhere! In 1999, most UK investors would have adopted a similar stance and been heavily biased to their home market. If they were still doing that now, it would have cost them very dear.

I decided to write this post about the similarities with 1999 based on my own experience and memory, but notice while researching the history that many others, including academic writers, have seen the same swan sailing across the lake.

We can’t know that history will repeat itself, but they say that a fool is a person who repeatedly carries out the same actions and expects a different result. Maybe this time it will be different but do you want to risk it?

Filed Under: Markets, Monthly commentary

Watching Brief- August 2020

3rd August 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

You need to be logged in to view this content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Monthly commentary

Monday mashup – a half of two halves

13th July 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

In other words, global stock markets have had two very different quarters in 2020 so far. Collapse to the end of quarter one, bounce back (in most markets) in quarter two. This in no way reflects what has happened to global economies, of course.

Here is a headline from Trustnet, last week:

Gold, growth and tech: The charts showing what you should have bought in 2020’s second quarter

The article underneath reported on returns from all sectors and geographies.

The market totally out of favour, both for equities and fixed income was the UK. I have been saying for ages that the world looking at the UK now thinks it is a lost cause economically. The risks of Brexit have been compounded by the perceived weak handling of Covid 19 in England (generally the American media thinks Scotland has done better).

Now some readers may think I have ‘gone native’ as I left the UK to live in Europe quite a while ago now. But I am not referring to European commentators in the main, but to US ones. Two analysts at Bank of America even suggested that the UK may have to be re-classified as an emerging market and they supplied data to back up that suggestion. The level of government debt is rising to levels not seen since WW2, for example.

It is easy to report on where one should have invested and I hope my readers have noted my enthusiasm for technology and innovation funds and for gold, but picking the place to invest long term starting now is much harder.

When the media wrote that the Asia Pacific region was a ‘basket case’ in 1996, I started recommending it to investors and they made very good money for over 20 years. I am wondering if the UK is the ‘basket case’ now and therefore offering great value to investors?

What do you think?

Filed Under: Markets, Monthly commentary, Portfolios

Monday mashup – lazy days of Summer?

6th July 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Where I live, there have been no quarantine (lockdown) restrictions for some time, except for special situations like going to the doctor or dentist or visiting a hospital when masks and proper disinfecting are compulsory. The weather is warm and humid with thunderstorms and today is a National Holiday – the anniversary of the crowning of the one and only King (Mindaugas).

It feels like Summer in every respect, that time when global stock markets usually go a bit flat as the big players take holidays, volumes fall, politicians stop meeting and messing things up and I suppose everyone usually feels a bit less like working overly hard.

Here is the weather forecast…

This year things will be very different depending on where you are. The relaxing of lockdown restrictions and opening of travel borders will allow many mostly younger people to try and forget Covid-19. That same opening up will, I am sure. re-ignite infection rates in places that were otherwise well in control.

As has already been demonstrated in the USA and Australia, there will not be so much a second wave as a resumption of hostilities. I get the feeling that the fight with the pandemic may be somewhat like the Great War, when gains and losses ebb and flow for years and many lives are sacrificed with the ‘donkeys” (ie leaders) mainly to blame for their ignorant and selfish leadership.

Yet, in spite of all that global stock markets are valuing companies as if nothing happened. This is in my opinion, and that of many others, simply because there is a glut of money (not real wealth) and it has nowhere else to go.

I suspect that over the Summer weeks to come, recent steady increases in share prices will stutter along upwards. The news flow on global economies will be terrible and there will be massive insolvencies and job losses but initially the market will pay no attention.

It is in my judgement certain that fundamentals like the need for businesses to make profits and borrowers to repay debt in a viable capitalist system will re-assert themselves.

At that stage, the market correction may be more dramatic than even what we saw in March 2020.

One can ‘make hay while the sun shines’, but one must get that hay under cover before the hurricane hits.

Filed Under: Markets, Monthly commentary

Watching Brief – July 2020

1st July 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Pottering About

Follow the money?

I have recently seen data from the investment trade press recording what sort of investment funds have taken in the most money so far this year.  That is a good indication of what advisers are recommending to clients and to a lesser extent what DIY investors are doing with their money.

You need to be logged in to view the rest of the content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us

Filed Under: Monthly commentary, Uncategorised

Monday mashup – PS

15th June 2020 by Mark Potter Leave a Comment

Since I posted this morning, I have read 2 news items that ought to be brought to your attention! My primary source is the New York Times excellent Dealbook daily briefing.

$50 million each way on the Dow?

One is that in their attempts to explain the illogical level of current stock market valuations, some professional traders point to the increase in private traders using the stock market as an entertainment medium in the absence of sporting events to bet on. Add that to the increase in day traders partly driven by on-line stock punting services (some of which must get close to what is legal in term of pumping shares) and it is a credible suggestion of at least a contributing factor.

Something like that happened before the Wall Street Crash, as I recall……

The bigger they are, the harder they fall

The second point is a bit technical but important. It has been noted that the huge Japanese investment/holding company Softbank, which operates more like an investment trust, with its Vision fund as a major activity, has been noted to be buying up bond issues from companies of which it has significant equity stakes.

Now this can be seen in a number of ways but the most negative interpretation might be that it is bailing out cash flow issues to prevent its investment targets going under. With Softbank, which made a fortune by investing early in Alibaba, nothing is a small deal. I wonder if this is another hairline crack in the dam (its disputed deal with WeWork being a slightly worrying to?). Google the name if you want to know more – it makes interesting reading for investors!

This matters not only to Japanese stock market investors because Softbank is a major shareholder in numerous global businesses. If Softbank goes pop, global stock markets would feel the chill.

Filed Under: Monthly commentary, Trading

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 31
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Page 35
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 38
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mid-month Musings – September 2026
  • Deep Dive – September 2026
  • Mid Month Musings with Mark (not me!)
  • Thank You
  • Deep Dive – August 2026

Archives

Categories

  • Academic theory
  • Announcements
  • Asset Allocation
  • Basics
  • Cost of investing
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Funds
  • House rules
  • Humour
  • Innovation
  • Markets
  • Members Only
  • Monthly commentary
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Passives and Trackers
  • Politics
  • Portfolios
  • Rants
  • Research tools
  • Site Content
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Trading
  • Uncategorised